Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

14-year-old banned: Fashion Week follows trend of public opinion

11/04/2008 7:50:00 PM.  | 
Australian Fashion Week organisers have bowed to public pressure and changed the minimum age for catwalk models, preventing the controversial appearance of a 14-year-old Polish girl.

Monika Jagaciak was to have been flown to Sydney for the event which begins at the end of this month.

The teenager has previously fronted a campaign for French fashion house Hermes and has been photographed in a white swimsuit being sprayed by a shower jet.

Organisers say they've revised their industry policy in light of industry and community concerns about the acceptable age for models.

The decision to fly a 14-year-old Polish girl to Sydney, to model in Australian Fashion Week has caused furore among the fashion industry.

Vogue magazine had said it wouldn’t use the teenager, saying there should be an age restriction of 16-years for models, similar to other international Fashion Week events.

Vogue editor Kirstie Clements told News Ltd they pulled the plug on using Jagaciak when they found out her age on Wednesday.

Fashion Week boss Simon Lock was unrepentant about bringing Jagaciak to Australia, saying designers love these models as coat hangers for their clothes, and are not exploiting their sexuality in any way.

AFW says they require any model under school leaving age to have written permission from their parents or guardians and permission from their school principal.

COMMENTS

Friday, 11 April 2008

I thought the immature in fashion was in vogue. Good on em for making a judgement call. She is a pretty girl, but a girl, not a woman. Maybe if they airbrushed more face ..

Posted by: David Daniel Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

good on em for having some morality and principal, there aren't many companies that have that any more,

Posted by: chris slvaeking, democratic crusaders alliance

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

Hmm....I think whoever researched the photos for this article should have looked a little closer....Photo 5/6 is actually of model Daria Werbowy (Aged 24), NOT Monika Jagaciak... On track with the article - this is really fantastic news!

Posted by: Hana Abbott, Sydney

Friday, 11 April 2008

Thanks for pointing this out, Hana! The girls in that Hermes get-up do look a bit similar. That's fixed now. Thanks for reading LIVENEWS.com.au.

Posted by: Anil Lambert-Patel, LIVENEWS.com.au Editor

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

Society condones this behaviour as we do here - why does the govt support kids financially just because they just don't like the rules at home or their parents impose - again hypocrites! No allowance should be made payable until it is appropriately investigated and if there are problems then the "CHILD" not adult should be placed in a safe place and be cared for. This really makes be sick to my stomach that the do gooders are out there worrying about this now when they themselves allow it!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

What a bunch of wowsers Australians have become and what gives you people the right to stop someone from working? She has minders and parents to look after her and they are responsible for her NOT YOU THE PUBLIC. I think most Australians have become stupid and self righteous idiots and if you can become incensed by this then how come you are not incensed by the evil Chinese and what they are doing to Tibet. Get your priorities straight and get a LIFE fools!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: James Jo, Brisbane

Friday, 11 April 2008

Quite right James. The usual predictable PC 'outrage' from journalism-dozy Oz with individual obesity the norm, thinner people must be held accountable, haute couture miserable. As for the poor perversion innuenda, what nonsense. Monika's attendance has been long known, but falling interest in Oz Fashion Week, has had organisers use Monika as a sacrifical "Absolute Power" publicity stunt. What then the Oz rag trade, the oz clothing, wool, industry, jobs future? - Theo. Bennett

Posted by: Theo Bennett, Holder

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

It's nothing but exploitation and nothing short of attracting paedophilia-she's 14-model clothes in her own age bracket-she's not 18-yet she is there with the heavy make up-she doesn't even right in those provocative pics-you would want men thinking she's hot at 14!-sick!When she reaches 18 then she is able to make up her own mind-she has a future in modelling at a later and more acceptable age and there's nothing wrong with that! and has nothing to do with any self-righteous crap!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

Few people seem to realize what actually happens for models behind the curtains. Typically the runway girls are dressed in little more than a g string. Their bodies, including their breasts are dusted so as to avoid perspiration getting into the clothing, keeping dry. People are very busy backstage. However it is no place for a 14 yo girl, no matter how self confident. I feel that the age restriction should be 18.

Posted by: David Daniel Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Friday, 11 April 2008

This is strategically a very savvy move by the organisers. A money-can't-buy publicity move. They had never intended to fly out the girl anyway. Just to cause widespread controversy and maximum media exposure for the event.

Posted by: Wilfred ., Killara

 

Saturday, 12 April 2008

Whats all the fuss about, she is a pretty girl so is my 2 year old. If you keep it in that context what is all the fuss about.

Posted by: joe surace, Berwick/Melbourne

Saturday, 12 April 2008

Joe, I don't blame you. You obviously are not familiar with the ways of the world. There are kiddie fashion shows and there are avant-garde, touchy-feely, French sexy, see-through, fashion shows.

Posted by: Wilfred ., Killara

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

Sorry nick - let me get this right. You want the union members to pay for the negotiations that win all the pay and... Tim Brunero, Sydney on Bosses need to get house in order

The NRL should try enforcing single yr contracts. All contracts should have a clause that allows the dropping of salary in line with offences. that... Nick again, maryborough on NRL: More to Maitua axing than meets the eye

Mate ... heaps of sympathy for your situation None for for your actions You do a disservice to the truly desperate Your a digrace... Spam Box, Tathra on EXCLUSIVE: Parliament petrol protester breaks silence

yeah concerned liberal people at rio, bhp, fmg and other big companies are making their employees take their holidays. too bad if you had holidays... Belinda Hummie, New lambton on Bosses need to get house in order

What a lot of political crap from both sides for an inevitable outcome.... A Narchy, The Hills on 'Backflip' means school funds will flow