Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Monday, 13 October 2008

'We all owe Peter Costello': Nelson talks up preferred Liberal leader

22/04/2008 2:38:00 PM.  | Yoni Bashan & Anil Lambert-Patel

Brendan Nelson has talked up the political record of Peter Costello as rumours of a future leadership tilt continue.

Coalition voters say they'd like Mr Costello to take the party into the next election rather than Dr Nelson.

The Opposition Leader claims he's not taking notice of the survey, but says the former treasurer has shown brilliant leadership in the past.

"Australians and Australian families that look at their children going from school to uni - or TAFEs and apprenticeships - into jobs owe Peter Costello an enormous debt," he said.

"[A debt] for what he's done over the last 12 years in particular, but [also] throughout his public life to make Australia the country that it is today."

A Newspoll out today shows 38 per cent of Coalition supporters favour a Costello-led party, with Malcolm Turnbull as deputy, versus 26 per cent who opted for the current team of Nelson and Julie Bishop.

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Dr Nelson commands my respect, as does Costello and the entire conservative parties. I think the speculation regarding leadership inappropriate at this point in time. But if Gillard decides to take on Rudd, I want her to know I don't support her either.

Posted by: David Daniel Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Peter Costello as leader is what the country needs now more then ever. It is only now that those working families once referred to as Howard’s battlers by Labor can see they were conned by both the unions and the media. The polls now showing 38% for Costello this would go 48% within no time at all. This would see poles in the vicinity of Rudd 52% Costello 48%. And this has taken only 6 months.

Posted by: Phillip Motbey, Boimaderry

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Fear not ! A 2010 Costello-Tunbull ticket is only 2.5 years away !

Posted by: neil Mason, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Peter Costello as leader is what the country needs now more then ever. It is only now that those working families once referred to as Howard’s battlers by Labor can see they were conned by both the unions and the media. The polls now showing 38% for Costello this would go 48% within no time at all. This would see poles in the vicinity of Rudd 52% Costello 48%. And this has taken only 6 months.

Posted by: Phillip Motbey, Bomaderry

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Does anyone know why the looney left won't comment on why trade union membership has declined by a net 100,000 in the last 12 months of the Howard government? (data source ABS) ? Was the Gillard Labor attack on Work Choices ALL LIES???

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Don't give up on us Peter Australia needs men of your caliber more than ever come back and take up your rightful position as Prime Minister

Posted by: charlotte young, Springwood

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Lets face reality, Costello's a loser. His own party would not back him, Howard made him look like a complete idiot, the voters told him where to go & after 17 years of prosperity mainly through mining- Australia is close to becoming a third world nation. I am not comparing him to Rudd or anyone else but if the Libs are so desperate for another leader, maybe they could import one with their 457 visa. They were right about not enough skilled workers, pollies in particular.

Posted by: Alex Uren, Luddenham

 

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Philip you are a blind optimist, that 38% is a poll of only Lib voters, so he got the majority of the minority vote. Which is inconsequential, the man is a shiftless backbencher, because in opposition he could care less about Australia, because he has no leadership intitiative even when it was practically handed to him. As for Dr Nelson's comments, WE don't owe Costello, we are the taxpayers, we pay them to run the country.

Posted by: Anthony L, N.S.W

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

To all you spastics who voted Labour, I can guarantee that in 3 years' time, when we've gone back to 22% interest rates and high inflation and unemployment, you'll all be begging for Mr Costello to come back and clean up the mess that your precious KRUDD the Marxist DUDD will have gotten us into! And when that time comes, frankly I wouldn't blame Mr Costello if he told you to shove it! You owe Howard and Costello EVERYTHING, and they should NEVER forgive you ingrates for what you did to them!

Posted by: Bob Philips, Stirling

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Bob, Spastic? Mate, grow up. It is abhorent of you, Mr Philips or Stirling to be taking such a term and be using it so loosely. By the way Mr Stirling, its LABOR not LABOUR, get it right.

Posted by: David ., NSW

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Oh here we go again, the PC brigade is out to get me! "You can't say this, you can't say that", blah blah blah blah blah! As if I give a rats how many bleeding-heart do-gooder lefties get offended by the words I use - you must be completely delusional if you think I care! But I would expect nothing less from someone who actually votes Labour (and I don't care if that's spelt wrong, I like to spell it MY way thanks very much!) so whatever, talk to the hand buddy! HAHAHAHAHA

Posted by: Bob Philips, Stirling

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Bob Phillips: Can you Count how many fingers i am holding up??? I will give you a clue !! ONE !! Which finger you might ask?? I will give you another clue The Middle one.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Bob, its spastics like you that make me want to turn this radio station off. Narrow minded, self obsessed, pea brained Liberal voters, its full of em. Keep voting Liberal, maybe Mr Nelson might get into double figures one day.

Posted by: David ., NSW

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Bob, did you happen to read Tim Bruneros' article about the weird people in SA? Its appropriate for you, you should read it one day.

Posted by: David ., NSW

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Geoff B, Touchy, touchy, are we. This article is in regard to Peter Costello, it mentions nothing of the decline in union membership attributed to fact that 'workchoices' prohibited employees from allowing 'unions' represent them. If Costello is so great why is that he remains in parliament? Taking into consideration that he is looking for employment within private enterprise. Even the Merchant Bankers dont want him!

Posted by: Sean Ambrose, Parliament House, Canberra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Sean A:The loony right have been a tad touchy since November 2007.They struggle with the concept that Rudd is a popular leader.They are in denial about the Quality of People they have left in Parliament and the lack of Leadership.I hope Costello does challenge for the Leadership but i don't think he has the guts or numbers to do it.

Posted by: Paul Keating Treasury House, Canberra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Paul and Sean, popularity does NOT equal to competence. Just common sense that is not common among left wing whingers and bludgers who voted labor. Not a surprise.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Australia has its new Prime Minister and we are very happy, who cares what the liberals are up too, it will take them years to get there act together. History shows when the liberals have lost it, they need to sort there dirty underwear out first and that takes years. Bronny love have a quiet chat to your mates because the squabbling will get louder especially if if the Bishop from Perth gets booted out..Boy we are going to have so much fun with what is left of the liberals.

Posted by: G Maybury, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

W.O Commonsense would detail that Peter Costello is not popular let alone competent. The Liberal party did inherit a debt from the previous government, however if we are to play this game, then lets have a look at the foreign debt that the newely elected Labor government inherited? Australia once rode on the sheep's back and now is riding on the back of a mining boom. Peter Costello's lack of confidence is displayed in his reluctance to challenge for the leadership, while his competence is displayed by fact that as Mr. Ambrose posted earlier; "even the merchant bankers don't want him".

Posted by: Justice Mayall, Kirrawee

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Justice, the foreign debt inherited by labor now is totally different from what lib inherited back in the 1990s. The former is due to consumer spending (current account deficit) from to a booming economy while the latter is mainly due to welfare payment due to unemployment from a recession we had to have, etc. Costello engineered the economic boom while your friends from labor introduced the recession. So I suspect you will be a laughing stock by saying Costello is incompetent.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

W.O, A point you may like to conceive is that Peter Costello is a 'Republican' as is 'Turnbull' however it is Hyacinth Bouquet that calls the shots in the Liberal party. Tony Abbott will be the next leader of the Liberal party. Why? Because he is a 'Monarchist' and Howard loyalist, in fact I have heard that he was 'donned' by Ms. Bouquet herself. It will be Tony Abbott as leader and Tunbull as deputy.

Posted by: Sean Ambrose, Parliamentary Bunker, Canberra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Sean, what you have discussed is internal liberal affair which I had not much interest. All I care about is how competent (or incompetent) Rudd govt is as he is the one driving the country and affect us all. As for libs, they will rebuild with or without Howard or Costello. Time will tell but all of these lib affairs cannot hide Rudd's incompetence and inaction on the majority of issues.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Ambrose. Your complete obsession with all things "opposition": is both fascinating and predictable. Fascinating because you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, and predictable because that is the Labor line to distract attention from Labor's ineptness.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Sean A : The Libs were always putting the boot in and trying to keep Labor out of Government for 11 long years.So i find it very hypocritical of them to try to deny us the same Right.It's Liberal Season now and time to bag a few tropies.

Posted by: Paul Keating In Government, Canberra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Paul, with due respect we respect your right to criticize whoever or whatever you wish. However I consider it hypocritical for one to criticize other party when the party he supports is failing to deal with the pressing issues (both at state govt level and federal level). So you can continue criticize if you wish, it simply won't hide Rudd's or Iemma's incompetence on inaction on many issues both at federal and state levels.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

WO;With due respect you are the best of the bunch.But unfair to tar Rudd with Iemma(Who is useless)I didn't vote for him.Don't confuse state and Federal they are completely different.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Bolton, I recall your obsession with the ALP when we were in opposition.

Posted by: Sean Ambrose, Parliamentary Bunker, Canberra

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Ambrose, with respect...I was also "obsessed" with the government of the day (its just that you did't like what I was saying about the government!). I think you need to review history with a sense of balance.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Personally I don’t like the sound of owing to Peter Costello, nobody put a gun to his head and forced him to become treasurer he decided to pursue it him self. I don’t go around saying my bosses owe me I just do my job as long as the boss want me, that’s it. However Peter Costello has done a great job as treasurer and I believe he would make a great PM, I am a little worried about what he has in mind with Aboriginal reconciliation, Republic, I would like more info on what he thinks on this.

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

 

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Has anyone actually TOLD Brendan, yet ?

Posted by: Neil Mason, Sydney

 

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Good on you Peter you certainly were the best treasurer the Countries ever had.You were certainley better than that pompous Placido Damingo of Australian politics, as he referred to himself, Paul Keating. As for Swan-one can only pity the poor rooster-he is pathetic.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Desmond:It's true that Peter Costello was treasurer during the greatest Boom time that Australia ever had.WHY did those boom times happen? Because of the Major Reforms that Keating put in place.Costello had an armchair ride and failed to utilize the money flowing in to set us up for life! And you have the gaul to call him the greatest? Get real! Look at what he has left,Inflation,Interest rates rising.Gap between rich and poor extended,etc He was an okay treasurer but not the greatest.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Friday, 25 April 2008

Paul Recession Keating it’s quite obvious from your pseudonym that you just worship the Bankstown boy. I have covered this for you before Keating’s so called reforms are hurting the Australian economy right now. Deregulating the Banks is what has led to our record foreign debt and the floating dollar is harming our exporters. Howard and Costello cleaned up the last Labor mess and the Coalition will soon be called upon to pick up the pieces after Rudd/Swan/Gillard wreck the economy-the process has already begun.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Friday, 25 April 2008

Paul Keating, I don't think you can attribute the economic booms all to Keating's reform while blaming the associated issues of high interest rate and inflation all on the liberal govt. Does it not sound too fair or hypocritical to you? One cannot claim all the credit for the good things while dissociate himself/herself from the associated issues - that will be very illogical. You cannot have it both ways.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Friday, 25 April 2008

One-eyed Keating from Dapto...why did trade union membership decline net by 100,000 in the last year of the Howard/Costello period? Maybe Howard and Costello were doing something right? But would you admit that?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 25 April 2008

Maybe it's because some AWA's had clauses which banned unions. Convenient ?? Anyhow, because membership declined doesn't mean it's for the better. Would YOU say the Lib voters who swung to '70% union dominated' Labor made the right decision ? I would but I can guess your answer.

Posted by: Anthony L, N.S.W

Friday, 25 April 2008

Anthony, it is a fact that with union dominated economy during the late 80s and early 90s due to high wage breakout causing high inflation and unemployment at that time, unions were one of the major reasons Australia was dealt with the "recession we had to have". You can brag on how good unions are all you like, but at the end of the day unions are NOT good for the economy unless they change the way they operate (eg improving productivity in exchange for real wage growth).

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Friday, 25 April 2008

Tony L, I don't think that "some AWA's" resulted in 100,000 union members walking. I think its all about union relevance. The point I was making was that working conditions obviously wern't all that bad! Just how long our 70% union dominated government, with a less than 18% workforce union membership lasts, remains to be seen. I'm happy to wait.....and watch!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 
 

YOUR SAY

<