Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

Desalination a future water option in US

25/04/2008 5:30:00 PM.  | AP
US scientists say desalination could help meet America's future water needs, but more research is needed to reduce costs and environmental impact.

In a report, the National Research Council (NRC) said improving technology was making it more realistic to consider desalination of water.

Some 97 per cent of the water on Earth - seawater and brackish groundwater - is too salty for drinking or irrigation.

"Uncertainties about desalination's environmental impacts are currently a significant barrier to its wider use, and research on these effects - and ways to lessen them - should be the top priority," said Amy K Zander, chair of the committee that wrote the report and a professor at Clarkson University.

"Finding ways to lower costs should also be an objective. A coordinated research effort dedicated to these goals could make desalination a more practical option for some communities facing water shortages," Zander said in a statement.

There is currently no overall coordination of federal research on desalination, and the analysis recommended the government work be coordinated by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Most desalination research has been funded by private business, the report notes.

Environmental concerns include threats to fish and other aquatic animals from water intakes, high energy use in the salt-removal process and disposal of the salty sludge left over from the process.

The study was sponsored by the US Bureau of Reclamation and US Environmental Protection Agency.

The National Research Council is an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, an independent organisation chartered by Congress to advise the government on scientific matters.

COMMENTS

Friday, 25 April 2008

But they already recycle water. Australians fail to realize that not recycling water damages the environment. Instead of sending water out to poison our fish stocks, we could recycle it into our dams. We treat it, anyway, before pumping it out to sea. At the moment, we are choosing to poison our fish and then, at a much higher cost, we desalinate the brew. The policy is only in place because the ALP have friends in industry who will profit from one way, but not the other.

Posted by: Odd Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

Bring back Get This!... Brendan Johnson, Penrith on Saleh quits Nova 96.9 to write book

as a kid he drops the knees into a bloke playing the ball.. as a man he glasses his missus..is it worth the risk to... b r, oak flats on Bird granted stay of execution

I think he must of been smelling the petrol....What a joke this man is!!!!... Get out of town, sydney on Religious rant casts further doubt on MP James Bidgood

Sorry nick - let me get this right. You want the union members to pay for the negotiations that win all the pay and... Tim Brunero, Sydney on Bosses need to get house in order

The NRL should try enforcing single yr contracts. All contracts should have a clause that allows the dropping of salary in line with offences. that... Nick again, maryborough on NRL: More to Maitua axing than meets the eye