Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 25 July 2008

Win for 'working families' but seniors claim they're in the cold

14/05/2008 7:15:00 PM.  | Jessica Campanaro & Yoni Bashan

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

The federal government says it understands seniors are struggling to make ends meet, but increasing the aged pension would be too costly.

Pensioners have accused the government of treating them with contempt for failing to lift the aged pension from $273 a week.

"They've chosen in this budget to treat senior Australians with contempt and to reject them as part of the working family mantra," National Seniors Australia head Michael O'Neill said.

"Senior Australians ... get nothing out of this budget."

Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan said a comprehensive review of pensions would be undertaken but adjusting the pension in this budget would have been too costly.

"We do share the concerns of ... all of those people who are living on pension level payments which are very low and are struggling to make ends meet," he said.

"This is very expensive in terms of those sorts of additions to pension income.

"It would have been a very big hit to the budget bottom line in one budget."

The budget includes $7 billion worth of measures for pensioners, including the $500 seniors' bonus, an increase in the utilities allowance to $500 a year (from $107 a year) and an increase in the telephone allowance to $132 a year.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said they were a first step.

"No one has to convince me that pensioners are struggling," Prime Minister Kevin Rudd told the Macquarie Radio Network.

"We regard this (budget) as a first step in trying to produce a better outcome for them."
The Australian Greens said that was not good enough.

"(Pensioners are) stuck on poverty levels - on $273 a week - and the Rudd government's giving them nothing in terms of a pay increase," Greens leader Bob Brown told reporters.

"That's disgraceful."

Senator Brown said the $500 one-off bonus was a "token gesture".

Nationals senator Barnaby Joyce said the Rudd government didn't understand the plight of pensioners.
"What are these people going to do?" Senator Joyce told reporters.

"They're the group that's under the most pressure in our society, and once a year they get a chance to buy the groceries and half a car load of fuel.

"Pensioners should have been better looked after."

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

To the "seniors" in our society...DON"T EVER VOTE LABOR AGAIN! You may have been "working families" once, but Rudd no longer regards you as important. Disgraceful. That's around 1 million votes that Rudd has lost!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

Dr Nelson said recently "Last year the Australian public listened to what Mr Rudd had to say. They heard Mr Rudd say that he was going to be a good economic manager and end the blame game. He was going to bring grocery prices down. He would bring petrol prices down. He would make housing more affordable. He would not increase taxation as a share of GDP. He would help, not hurt, what he calls working families. These are the benchmarks that Mr Rudd set for himself." He failed everywhere.

Posted by: In Evah Tah Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

What’s all the fuss about the Swan Budget. All he did was to pander to his Labor roots and engage in the politics of envy. Means testing for people that did not fit into the Labor demography. They delight in hurting the very people that are the brightest and keep the economy ticking. The future fund type of measures, the carer and pensioner bonuses and the means to do them were all due to the skills of the Coalition. Rudd and Swan had everything laid out for them-unlike what Mr. Howard had to deal with when he took office in 1996.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

'There have been real cuts' in among the spending spree, where they funnel cash to their mates, they are very careful to hiy people who can't fight back. Women who have just given birth and 'wealthy' people who want a reliable car. The result will be the opposite of what Howard and Costello achieved. Howard and Costello managed to lift the tax contribution of the top 5% of earners from 33% to 38%. All revenue was lifted from the top 5% from 24.5% to 32.3%. Clearly Rudd will make poor pay more.

Posted by: In Evah Tah Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

The federal government is claiming that the budget is good for Australia and will saved the working families $2080. If we spend that money at K-Mart, the money will go to China. If we spend it on petrol it will go to the Arabs, if we purchase a computer it will go to Taiwan, If we purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras, and Guatemala, if we purchase a good car it will go to Japan, If we purchase useless crap it will go to Korea and none of it will help the Australian economy. The Rudd Government takes the water away from our farmers, and pours our money into the states who have squandered the GST to win elections . And our pensioners have to live on the smell of an oily rag. WE DESERVE BETTER. Thank you for your help. Kevin Rudd & Wayne Swan. (Australian Prime Minister & Australian Treasurer)

Posted by: Phillip Motbey, Bomaderry

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

Why blame labor for things done by Howard Govt. Who damaged the Australian Industry & productivity in last decade, was it Labor or Lib? If working families are getting tax cuts then why you are having pain in UR stomach? If they haven't, then also U would have never felt happy! U guys are wingers! Shame on U all! I do agree that Rudd & Swan has ignored Pensioners & should find solution. Give them some time to take breath of fresh air! One can wait& watch.

Posted by: Critic Mail, Melbourne

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

So much for helping with everyday living expenses Mr Rudd and Mr Swann. You have not lowered the cost of petrol by cutting taxes on fuel, you have not helped with grocery prices and you only contributed towards 50,000 low rental houses by 2011 and yet you are bringing 200,000 immigrants into Australia in just the next twelve months, so tell me where they are going to live...obviously rentals will rise again.

Posted by: Christina Samuels, Mooloolaba

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

What rubbish, they're living off the pensions set from the previous Govt. are they not ? The one they consecutively voted for, good ol' Johnny popular with the oldies- but if Rudd fails to increase the pension he is the contemptuous one. Am I blind or surrounded by biased Libs ?

Posted by: Anthony L, N.S.W

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

Groceries, petrol, medical, utilities, clothes, private health care, insurance, interest rates have ALL GONE UP SINCE RUDD GOT THE SEAT-how far do you think the pension will cover? when they have paid their taxes(they worked for) being squandered overseas for foreign aid and Rudd cannot improve their pensions - that's a disgrace - I don't think any pensioner in this country should be suffering or not being able to put on the heat in winter for the shock of getting the next bill.

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

Thursday, 15 May 2008

HOW MUCH DID JHONNY (LIB) increased the pension in last decade, Someone has got some IDEA? Compared to how much blood HE has sucked from oldies,(who toiled hard for this country) in the form of Taxes on Taxes (GST). Oldies can not afford a bottle of milk for their cuppa, LIVING on one loaf of bread for SEVERAL days. IF RUDD & SWAN DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THIS THEN THEY HAVE TO PAY THRO' THERE NOSES! SOONER OR LATER...WAKE UP POLITICIANS OF THIS COUNTRY OR YOU WILL GET KICKED OUT SOON...

Posted by: Sandy S, Sydney

Thursday, 15 May 2008

Anthony, I think you are conceding that Rudd IS at least as bad as Howard WAS? There is nothing Liberally biased about pointing that out is there? If you are critical of Howard for not addressing the issue, WHY ARE YOU NOT CRITICAL OF RUDD?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

What on earth is defined as a "working family" - even Rudd has a problem with explaining this - how much more insulting can it get - it is quite obvious that anyone earning $150,000 is not part of the "working family" and it makes no difference that you have children, make sacrifices, pay higher taxes, support the country. What a great message to receive from a govt who professed that they would look after the "working family". Let's hope those who voted in a socialist govt are content with it!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

YOU CAN’T SIMPLY DEFINE WORKING FAMILY BECAUSE IT’S A BS STATEMENT. DONT TRY TO WORK IT OUT IT A WASTE OF TIME. IT ALL BS. But since it’s the issue of the day (vomit) I would guess "working families" is code for the Labor down and out bludgers think tanked by the unions. Since ALP is in bed with the unions they went along with it. It sounds good and catchy with little meaning. It kind of like a saying in a Hollywood movie "shake and bake" sounds catchy but meaningless. Sad it worked

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

We may get tax free euthanasia and free furneral! Age discrimination, particulary against the poor is common. The government leader need his hearing checked, because every relationship needs a good listener. The Budget08 is actually the next Election Budget, some younger people don't really understand, until it's too late in their life. But we luckely may not be around that year.

Posted by: Ture Sjolander, Suffers Paradise

 

Thursday, 15 May 2008

There is no doubt that aged pensioners (not self funded retirees) are struggling, but a few facts are....taking into account CPI, the libs increased aged funding 99% & increased veteren health care 108%. The aged population during this time only increased by 28%. In 1997 the Howard govt changed the way the pensions were calculated. Under labor they were linked to CPI, he made it as a % of male total average weekly earnings. The result TODAY is that pensioners are higher than they would've been!

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

Nathan Brown is a disgrace.The fact he is predicting and inciting violence for future clashes is the problem with his comments..I too teach my child... kerry hulm, colac on 'He's childish': Storm hits back at Nathan Brown

You Liberals have no idea. Housing prices went through the roof when Howard and Costello were in power. They were riding on the back of... David ., NSW on One million under mortgage stress by Christmas: report

BROWNIE FOR PM.... I think if he does cop a fine we should all go out to the game on Monday V the Dogs and put... Johnny Utah, Kogarah on Brown erupts over Melbourne's 'illegal tactics'

They are THUGS. The NRL has done nothing about it all year, so it's time to get some back. Go the Warriors this week. Little... Bowen El, , on 'He's childish': Storm hits back at Nathan Brown

RUDD has a lot to answer for now! First he ruined Australia now He's gone and ruined Europe,China next.How could he have done all this... Paul Keating, Upper Tweed on Eurozone recession fears loom