Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Nelson might have the stats, but politics is about perceptions

16/05/2008 3:19:00 PM.  | Michael Cavanagh
Politics is largely about perceptions.

Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson now has to prove he is a credible alternative when it comes to sound economic management following the relatively positive reaction to Wayne Swan’s first Labor budget in 13 years.

How well he does this will also have an impact upon his party colleagues who are people driven by public opinion, and since the election the polls have not been kind to Dr Nelson and the Coalition.

The embattled leader now has to show he is strong and decisive.

His commitment to block the proposed tax on alcopops has put him well and truly on a collision course with the government.

Dr Nelson argues that binge drinking, especially amongst women, has in fact declined and that the tax on alcopops is more about delivering the government more cash for its coffers rather than trying to stem the problem.

But he is going to find it hard to cut through and successfully mount this argument.

He may be right, but there is a concern within the community that drinking by the nation’s young is out of control.

This has no doubt been fuelled by television images which depict out of control young people swilling mixer drinks whenever the question of the tax arises.

Dr Nelson is in danger of being caught between a rock and a hard place.

The government will paint him as a person who is playing at cheap politics by appealing to the hip pocket nerve instead of supporting attempts to reduce binge drinking.

This has been shown by Labor so far arguing that Dr Nelson appears to be one of the few that thinks there is not a binge drinking problem.

It has made little of the fact that if the tax is blocked then it will put a hole in the budget surplus and its economic strategy.

Emotion will usually start as favourite over cold hard facts, so the government will continue to push the danger of binge drinking, while Dr Nelson will try to get some traction as he mixes both fact and the need to address drinking problems.

While his stand against the alcopops tax is something tangible that the Opposition can do, his call for a five cent a litre cut in the fuel excise tax has its own element of playing politics.

Petrol prices are causing stress, but while the Opposition can use its numbers in the Senate to block the mixer drink levy; there is nothing it can do when it comes to the fuel excise.

But it gives a good headline, and it will be the government that will have to wear the flak as people nod in agreement to the cheaper fuel idea.

Some party colleagues had defined the budget as the time to reassess the direction of the Liberal Party.

Read that as whether Dr Nelson has any chance of holding on to the leadership.

For the time being Dr Nelson appears to have bought some time on the leadership issue – but realistically if you were a bookie, you would be framing long odds on whether he will be Opposition leader right through to the next election.

COMMENTS

Friday, 16 May 2008

To all you journos that want to go on about who will lead the liberals.Get over it because it wont matter.This Rudd led Labor government is starting to show its true colours and you would have to be an idiot to believe that the TAX on alcopops is not just that a tax.It has nothing to do with binge drinking and will not I repeat WILL NOT stop anyone who is going out to get drunk from paying more or using an alternative.

Posted by: Nick Arena, Sydney

 

Friday, 16 May 2008

Brendan Nelson is showing a lot of courage given his low poll ratings. His performance in his budget reply speech was excellent. Prior to that, in question time and later in a suspension of standing orders motion, Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan performed dismally in spite of the assistance they got from the speaker. Rudd didn't seem to understand the question when asked about the progressive increase in alcopop tax. He kept reading from a report, which he refused to table, but did not say why the tax should increase if it was meant to reduce consumption. In the suspension of standing orders debate Swan kept defying the speaker and did not directly address the points that had been raised by Malcolm Turnbull-all he kept doing was referring to the oppositions leadership-pathetic.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Friday, 16 May 2008

Des, I watched that whole sequence (I work in my own business from home), what was apalling was the way Rudd stormed out of the chamber and the speaker wimpishly refused to make him clarify a point. I really believe the Rudd "bubble" will burst (soon) as long as Nelson has the balls to not blink on the alcopop tax, or medicare rebate. I think Rudd is capable of a dummy spit, and even take his bat and ball home! He looked noticably irritated as Nelson delivered his budget reply.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Friday, 16 May 2008

What is it that creates perceptions-biased partisan journalists and political spin doctors. It is our, the publics, fault for being taken in.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Friday, 16 May 2008

I think the usual suspects are lining up to denounce Dr Nelson, but they are going to find it hard to criticize him, as he has done his job well. I think, instead, the critics will point to his popularity.

Posted by: In Evah Tah Ball, Carramar/Sydney

Sunday, 18 May 2008

In Evah Tah Ball-Could not agree more-They would include the ABC, large chunks of the Fairfax press and a host of journalists from News Limited. Of course they will claim that they are being objective. Some of them had the hide to say that Brendan Nelson was being gimmicky in his budget reply statement. They do not make the same comments about Rudds gimmicks, which include among others-Sorry speech, his Global warming mumbo jumbo, his signing of the symbolic Kyoto treaty, his concern for 'working families', supermarket prices, petrol price watch dog, 2020 summit etc.etc.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Saturday, 17 May 2008

Dear media morons (Live News included). Today we see headlines saying Nelson "forgot" to consider State GST revenue in his 5c/litre petrol price reduction. Shouldn't this prompt you to ask "what are the states doing with all the increased revenues they are getting from the increases in petrol priceing" in preference to the immediate put down of the opposition? C'mon guys - get serious, do the job you are paid for. The media re the biggest bludgers around.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Saturday, 17 May 2008

I agree with you, Geoff, but maybe you need to moderate the accusation of bias? Instead of naming livenews, you might say 'there is substantial bias among all Australian media outlets.' I don't think the editors of Livenews are deliberately misleading, but intentionally provocative so as to get comment. Rudd has a spin department, but the Libs don't have that kind of traction. One can't demand the network be balanced when it is the same journalists.

Posted by: In Evah Tah Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Saturday, 17 May 2008

It would be interesting what the polls would say on who would be returned on a two party preferred basis- where are the polsters?

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Sunday, 18 May 2008

Brendan, you need to get onto this.. BEFORE the election Rudd called on Federal agencies to investigate the Exclusive Bretheren, TODAY! he has rejected calls for such an investigation stating "it would unreasonably interfere with members' rights to practise their faith freely and openly". How about you start counting (and Live News start publishing) the Rudd pre-election lies??

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Monday, 19 May 2008

Come on, when is all this silly business going to end. The election promises are in tatters and yet Rudd still keeps going on and getting support. No lap tops for every high school kid, state governments still running a muck in the areas of education and health, the most ridiculous move to encourage people out of private health insurance, not to mention the obvious and blatant tax grab on alcopops...come on Australia how long are we going to fall for all this spin!!!!

Posted by: Chrissie S, Mooloolaba

 

Monday, 19 May 2008

Folks, In Nov 2007 we threw out sound economic management. Rudd lied to get into office (fact), in the budget Rudd hasn't looked after working families (fact), Rudd has ignored seniors (fact), to regain some middle ground Nelson through petrol has tried some popularist politics (fact). In Australia we now have the politics of lies and popularism. We are going to be in the crap until 2010, when hopefully Costello will once again lead a sound economic management team. Well, that's what I hope!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

rant rant rant... rant rant, rantrant on Obama labelled 'terrorist' at McCain rally

look.. thats just weird.... emily g, melb on Victoria Beckham rubs bird poo on her face

Colin, it would be 46-0 if that was the case. Also back then it was still the 5m rule, so the 38-0 drubbing of St... alan truong, bankstown on End of an era: Storm facing a freefall?

but but there is only 6 lung fish nick! sometimes it amazes me what they spend their money on.... Belinda Hummie, New lambton on Dam builders sued to save lungfish

Geoff, you get a response of your very own. Unlike you, I have not exposed details about my personal education or employment history. You know... darren carrow, brisbane on Henson under fire over school model scout