Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 25 July 2008

Rudd hits record as preferred PM, but Budget approval weak

20/05/2008 9:44:00 AM.  | Edwina Bartholomew & Anil Lambert-Patel

Kevin Rudd's popularity has soared, giving him the strongest lead over an opposition leader in 30 years, while Brendan Nelson battles with internal party politics.

The Opposition Leader's rating as preferred prime minister has actually improved since the last poll, up to 17 per cent, but it's cold comfort when Kevin Rudd is sitting on 70.

It's the biggest lead since the Herald Neilsen poll began in 1972 and puts extra pressure on Brendan Nelson, who's locked in a feud with Shadow Treasurer Malcolm Turnbull over the Budget reply promise to reduce the fuel excise by five cents a litre.

But it's not all good news for the government, with the response to the Budget lukewarm.

A Newspoll shows 29 per cent of voters believe they will be better off under the Budget, compared to 32 per cent who fear they will lose out.

Nationals leader Warren Truss says the latest figures are a positive for the Coalition.

"Well it's good to have polls - a bit of an improvement," he said.

"But we've still got a long way to go. Brendan Nelson I think is being more widely appreciated for his response to the Budget and the leadership that is being provide. But we've got a long way to go yet to get ahead of the government and we're going to keep working at it."

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

who the hell responds to these polls? somthing is amiss or overly biased, so far the bloke has lied to (yes lets be honest about it ,lied), misled,shortchanged us on the budget and flooded the media with symbolic BS that has now seen us with record fuel prices,food prices,rental prices .we've got high inflation and they are still taxing to to death, and spending more, everyone must be in fairy land or somthing,we are headed for next great depression and all rudd has done is throw fuel on a fire

Posted by: chris slaveking, democratic crusaders alliance

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

And this is despite Rudd's budget being rated worse than Costello's first ever budget! We just deserve the crap we get. The "average" punter is a mug!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

One has to question the intelligence (or severely lack of it) of so called "working families". Even with escalating living cost, inflation, petrol/grocery/housing, etc people continued to be blined and brainwashed by Rudd's trash retorics and spins. I have to say whatever happens next - Australia, you totally deserve it and therefore have to suck it in!

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

I love how record feul prices/groceries/rent prices/house prices is now Rudds fault. Hate to break it to you guys, but this was going on way before he became PM. Its just you are so blindly devoted to your party you cannot see it, and now your boy is out you blame what is convienient on the guy you dont like. Im interested to know what your opinion was on Feul/Groceries/rent when Howard was still PM? It was still pretty atrocious then -whats your excuse?

Posted by: Brian Henderson, The way it is

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

I hate to break it to you Henderson, Rudd is VERY lucky. He has yet to deliver ANYTHING to "working families", he has alienated "seniors" and "self funded retirees". He has delivered a budget rated as worse than Costello's first ever budget. I wouldn't be jumping for joy just yet. People will wake up....eventually. Its not that Rudd is any good, its just that the opposition isn't (YET!)

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Brian H. Its not that "record fuel prices/groceries/rent prices/house prices" are Rudd's fault, its just that he said he had all the answers (lies) and he doesn't have any answers. That's why those of us in the middle are so critical. Rudd got in because middle Australia believed him. He hasn't delivered.

Posted by: Gary Benson, Blacktown

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Brian, Rudd didn't cause these issues, but he promised that he will lower these before the election! He claimed he has "plans", "fresh ideas" to "put downward pressure" on inflation & interest rate, & yet after 6 months cost of living is even higher than before! When Howard was PM things were NOT so expensive! So according to you Rudd will never need to be accountable for these - he can simply blame the previous govt for the next three years, huh? Moronic ignorant labor supporters.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

No im not suggesting that Rudd is never accountable - But come on. Petrol/Groceries/housing/cost of living was skyrocketing before he got in. You guys want simple solutions to complex problems, and you want them immediatley otherwise you write off as "lies". The fact is, you guys are blind followers of your party - everything Howard did you lapped up, even when he was rorting you. Now hes not PM all the things you swept under the carpet you can conveniently blame Rudd.

Posted by: Brian Henderson, The way it is

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Brian henderson: You bought up the truth and they are devoted Lib Supporters.I think it's just a case of Jealousy that they continue to attack Labor. When they know that the problems were already there before Rudd got in.Rudd is trying to address problems but it will take time as the problems took 11 years to build up.

Posted by: Paul Keating Very Happy, Dapto

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Henderson - "skyrocketing" under Howard...get a reality check!

Posted by: Gary Benson, Blacktown

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Brian, you have deliberately dodged our argument - Rudd promised that he will fix these before the election - and he hasn't. Rudd created expectation that he has the magic cure even though there isn't, & people voted based on that expectation. So we don't blame Rudd for causing these, but we can certainly blame him for LYING, don't you think? Give me an effective policy or plan he has mentioned for lowering petrol/grocery prices (so far no labor voters can give me an answer for this).

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Brian Henderson, The way it is- Rudd is a Dudd and already his false promises are unraveling. Two points with regards to your comments. 1) The Coalition ran a very strong economy cleaning up the Labor mess, halving Labors unemployment rate and still managed to average below 3% for inflation-Rudd has already failed in these areas. His budget is admitting a loss of 130000 odd jobs, inflation has hit +4% and the economy is tipped to slow amid a loss of confidence by business and consumers. 2) Rudd sold himself as having the 'vision' and that he was the only one offering new leadership. So he should be doing better than the Coalition-he is not even close and never will be. The latest poll has suggested that the Coalition would have brought down a better budget.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

PM Rudd what a job you are doing on those libs, never seen any group gets so nasty with one and other, just look at the way you are attacked for being the best PM.

Posted by: G Maybury, Sydney

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Maybury, Rudd is hardly the "best PM" he's only been there 6 months and is yet to do anything defining. His first test was the budget and he's screwed that up (just look at the polls). To be even remotely classed as "best" I think you need to look at him 11+ years down the track. I have a feeling that we may not remember him by then!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

G. Maybury, you have a (conveniently) short memory...I think Hawke, Keating, Latham, Beasley, Rudd and many others, all demonstrated similar traits when then political career was on the line?

Posted by: Benny Hillman, Port Stephens

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

I don't believe that these polls are correct - with the continued outcry and the "WEAK" budget, people losing their homes, interest rates will continue to rise that this bullshit artist Rudd is still popular - who is kidding who?

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

We've had the equivalent of Palm Sunday with the uncritical salvation focused public adulation of 'Dudd Vader' the one-trick-pony, hacker, slasher,razor-gang-man from Queensland. When constructive building has to happen or be judged by the public, perhaps we will see a crucifixion. I have a spare nail and if he needs a burning chariot to go to heaven in I also have some mower fuel to help light it, if he wants the help. I'd love to help. Mind you - they let barabas out of jail by choice - hmmmm.

Posted by: R M, Brisbane

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Food prices are in large part are to do with drought, housing/rental pricing has nothing to do with fed govt, petrol prices are still the 4th cheapest in the OECD - stop whinging. Interest rates are at average levels not skyrocketing, inflation, has tipped 4% which a little higher than it should be but only just - I DON"T HAVE A PROBLEM AT ALL with the Howard/Costello run economy. But I am the "working class family" that Rudd goes on about & this budget SCREWED US.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Rudd in action - when he doesn't get is "own way" - http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s2249409.htm http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/ There is no point in Rudd trying to redeem himself - he continues with the rhetoric - he now claims like his supporters that he's only had 5 months - well he had big plans before the elections so where are they? No plans, no idea! he blames the previous govt - well what a joke this man is-view the video

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Thoughts of "Chairman" Geoff... The media scrutinises EVERYTHING that the Opposition does and says, but does not scrutinise ANYTHING that the Rudd Government says or does. Why?

Posted by: Geoff "Chairman" Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

because 70% OF ALL THOSE SURVEYED APPROVE OF HIM YOU IDIOT..... why scrutinise somebody that the majority of people think is doing a bloody good job (considering the cards dealt to him by JH & PC).... Lap the numbers up fellas they just prove that your moronic points (such as 'he promised the world and hasn't delivered') mean nothing to the majority of people who are just happily watching the country make a turn for the better.... all the best fighting your losing battle though....hehehehe

Posted by: ecstatic unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

"heading for extinction" Unionist, dapto. Refer to Dan's comments and references below. Instead of foolish gloating..read the facts NOT the rhetoric. Surprisingly, rhetoric can't run the country. Rudd is a liar.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Dapto. Half those surveyed also thought Rudd's budget was crap, and the majority thought Costello's first budget was better? So what do you make of that, idiot!

Posted by: Gary Benson, Blacktown

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Ecstatic Unionist: your silly name says it all - only those involved in unions are happy under Rudd, while the rest of the country is screwed up. And you are right - 70% of those who participated in the survey ARE IDIOT - God knows who are those bunch & whether they have been arbitrarily selected to suit the purpose of propaganda? If 70% of electorates are happy why is there so much angst out there from the budget? Or was this survey done BEFORE the budget?

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

must have done the survey in Wentworthville, eh Benson..... by the way how's Little Johnnie's Darwin to Adelaide Railway going.... the way of the future wasn't it??? broke after 4 1/2 years.....haha. the state of the country wasn't much better by the time he'd finished with it.....:)

Posted by: chuckling unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Geoff: The media tow the labor line - they have to otherwise they can be subjected to losing their job if any of them show some hint of integrity - a lot has to do with cash for comment, they are told what to write -it basically means that you have to be loyal to the govt of the day and generally the loyality lies only with the labor govts as they have enough funds to keep them covered! - the reason why the govt of the day wants no competition eg Woolworths and Coles are getting bigger!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

At the end of the day Kevid Dudd, promised the Australian public, he had all the answers for working families pre-election. He had all the solutions to turn this fine country around. What does he do? Gets into power and holds a summit, to seek the answers. The Australian public have been mislead. It does concern me that NSW recorded a big swing to the labor party in the last federal election, when this state has been run to the ground by a labor government for the past 10+ years.

Posted by: Matthew Elder, Baulkham Hills

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

people wanted JH out because they could see he had lost touch with the electorate and had begun to dictate rather than listen. Labor will still lose the next election in NSW, but only if the Libs can run a decent campaign for once. as for you 'bolts', i've said it before... go suck eggs....:) the rest of us are all very happy with the means test 4 b/bonus, the pressuring of private health into actual competition & could care less about your share portfolios... and , of course, slavechoices

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Moronic Unionist, in the "sucking eggs" department, please let me refer you to ABS data (not Rudd rhetoric) which refers to the terminal decline in union membership, even at the time when the supposed horror coalition IR laws were in place. Looks like your members do have brains after all...they are ALL LEAVING!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Bolts, someone should tell "Dapto" that unionists represent only 18% of the workforce (and declining!). He needs to get a grip on reality!

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Moronic Unionist: a word of genuine advice for you: if one drops out of health insurance & opt for a public system, you will be PRICED OUT OF PRIVATE SYSTEM for the REST OF YOUR LIFE whe s/he gets order & wants to rejoin. The reason is the premium would have gone up significantly due to you being order & also due to many people dropping out NOW. By that time you will NOT be able to afford private care even if you want to. But of course, most labor supporters can't care less about this I am sure.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

No, unfortunately the Coalition lost because the unions ran a scare mongering campaign-some of these unions were the public sector unions who by the way were not affected by workchoices and provided labor with more funds! Now getting back to Rudd and his interview with Kerrie O'Brien - he states he has only had5 months - apart from the fact he can't count - he did LIE to the public as he said he had plans - now with the b/b being taken away from the "Rich" what does he define as a millionaire!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

WO: if Private Health companies have to GENUINELY compete for consumers dollars (instead of sitting back and watching the Federal Government drive the customers in like cattle) the premiums will HAVE to drop... what incentive was there before??? as was stated the yesterday by the consumer group CHOICE "Income has grown and the Rudd Government has made changes to the threshold to reflect that growth. Consumers affected by this change will now be free to choose"

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

They cannot compete with the so called "free Health service",nothing is free in life-people have insurance on car & homes the same goes with private cover-it forced people out until the coaliton made it attractive to bring people back-it was a lot better before Medicare and that is what people need to realise-private cover takes the pressure off the public system-something that most people forget-BTW many people can't afford it, they do without including pensioners who have continued to pay!

Posted by: Dan Concerned, *

 

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Seriously, I think we all deserve this. Mr Rudd did not come to the election with defined policies. he only came with promises. At the time i was concerned about how he was going to meet those expectations seeing he wasnt putting any figures or policy suggestions forward. I hope I am wrong but it seems to be playing out that he was never more than a really good salesman flogging an inferior product. Oh well, Australia wanted a change. Sometimes we dont know what we have until we lose it.

Posted by: Chrissie S, Mooloolaba