Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 29 August 2008

Courtroom sketch 'made my nose too big': Sept 11 mastermind

6/06/2008 9:35:00 AM.  | Reuters | Jane Sutton & AAP

Three of five alleged plotters in the September 11 terrorist attacks have today demanded they be sentenced to death at a US military hearing.

Alleged mastermind Mohammed along with Wallid Bin Attash and Ramzi Binalshibh have told the court they have been looking to be a martyr for a long time.

Mohammed stood in a US military court, sang a chant of praise to Allah and said he would welcome the death penalty.

"This is what I wish, to be martyred," Pakistani captive Mohammed, the highest-ranking al-Qaeda operative in US custody, told the Guantanamo war crimes court.

He and four accused co-conspirators appeared in court at the Guantanamo Bay US naval base in Cuba for the first time on charges that could result in their execution.

As the judge questioned him about whether he was satisfied with the US military lawyer appointed to defend him, Mohammed stood and began to sing in Arabic, cheerfully pausing to translate his own words into English.

"My shield is Allah most high," he said, adding that his religion forbade him from accepting a lawyer from the United States and that he wanted to act as his own attorney.

He criticised the United States for fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, waging what he called "a crusader war", and enacting illegal laws, including those authorising same-sex marriages.

The judge, Marine Col Ralph Kohlmann, tried to persuade Mohammed to accept a lawyer, telling him, "It's a bad idea for you to represent yourself."

Mohammed looked old and portly and wore a long, bushy grey beard and big black military-issue glasses.

He wore a neat white tunic and turban, in stark contrast to the saggy white undershirt he wore in photographs taken after his capture during a raid in Pakistan in March 2003.

No photographers were allowed inside the courtroom for the first appearance of Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators on war crimes charges.

Artist Janet Hamlin's sketches were reviewed to make sure it didn't include classified information, and wound up in Mohammed's hands. Mohammed wasn't pleased.

"I heard he said I should compare it to the FBI photo of him," Hamlin said, clutching a copy of the much-publicised capture photo that showed Mohammed in a T-shirt looking dishevelled and unshaven.

Asked if Mohammed had a point, Hamlin said: "I agree totally" before rushing back to the courtroom to downsize his nose.

COMMENTS

Friday, 06 June 2008

This creatures inhumanity is only outweighed by his vanity. It would be humorous if it wasn't so pathetic.

Posted by: colleen a, Sydney

 

Friday, 06 June 2008

He’s a very slow learner, typical terrorist, THE COURT will decide if he gets death or gets locked up in a dark cell for 23hrs a day with a 1 hour walk chained up like a dirty dog for the rest of his pathetic miserable life. Rot in the cell then in hell you spec of insignificant sh t

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

 

Friday, 06 June 2008

How many terrorist masterminds do u have to meet b4 u can say what is typical?? Slow learner? Well lets hope we dont get a fast smart learner in his stead. Imagine what he would do. To me, He is a poorly educated, brainwashed buffoon. Having said that he is obviously not dumb. Vanity? An artist gave him a copy of the cartoon to look at. To antagonise him most likely, why are we antagonising people? Why do some want dirty, and chain up others? This is our societies problem.

Posted by: John Stihl, Parramatta

 

Friday, 06 June 2008

Can someone please define what terrorist means? The biggest terrorist we have seen is MR G.Bush, Mr T. Blair and our Mr J .Howard. Think for 30 seconds , what these guys has bought to this world. What happens when you try and standing up for your individual recognition, culture, identity and religions?

Posted by: Ramesh Prasad, Liverpool

Friday, 06 June 2008

OK here's a definition. Someone that sets out to kill or maime random people or randomly destroy property, usually done for political or religious agenda's, with the aim of creating terror and achieving an outcome that could not otherwise be achieveable through legal means. And before you go claiming that this makes Bush or Blair a terrorist, not the emphasis on "random" destruction and "outcomes that could not be achieved through legal means".

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

Friday, 06 June 2008

define what terrorist means? Are you that stupid? Not much more for me to say.

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

Monday, 09 June 2008

Ramesh (if that is your name) you are a complete fool. And the argument you make is that made by those that support the ideals of terrorists and terrorism. Iraq is now progressively becoming a normal democracy. and idiots like youi will gradually disappear into oblivion, HOPEFULLY.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Friday, 06 June 2008

I asked just a simple question, define terrorism. Where does stupidity and thing comes from. Don't you think all those inocent kids and families kill by western allies in Iraq constitute to terrorism from their point of view. Open you eyes and see from there point of view.

Posted by: Ramesh Prasad, Liverpool

Saturday, 07 June 2008

Terrorists kidnapping husband wives kids, car jacking families, blind folding them drive to a location load the family car up with explosives making the family drive the loaded car without them knowing its loaded with explosives and detonating the car when it is known to be near a US/coalition check point. These are one of many bastard acts by terrorists in Iraq, Ramesh you didn’t mention this fact yet you accuse of the US being at fault for killing kids, shame on you. My eyes are very open mate

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

Saturday, 07 June 2008

Tell me Ramesh, do you believe that the Allies in WW2 were "terrorists"? I mean in their war to, liberate Europe from a fanatical, mass-murdering dictator, they had to kill a lot of innocent German women and kids. Does that make them "terrorists". Idiotic, rhetorical questions like the one you ask here are simply intellectual pollution of the modern world, it's like a corrosive by-product of a free, democratic society. Listenning to morons like you is the price we pay for a free society.

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

 

Sunday, 08 June 2008

Jo Stalin (I can't believe you would call yourself that and go on an ill informed tirade against the Germans...) Actually, the Allies, particularly the British, committed atrocities on German civilians. The bombing of Dresden comes to mind... And then of course, they handed a great deal of Europe over to Stalinist Russia, who tortured and murdered an estimated ten million civilians. Please be a little more informed before you make such statements.

Posted by: Andrew Niland, North Bay

Monday, 09 June 2008

So Andrew, you are promoting the view that the Allies were the BAD GUYS in WW2. Thanks mate, now I've heard it all.

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

Monday, 09 June 2008

By the way Andrew, I just re-read my earlier post and I don't see any "tirade" against the Germans. In fact I only mention "German" once in my comment. My tirade is against ignorant morons that advocate a view that Americans and Britains are terrosists in todays world equal to the Osama Bin Ladens and Al Zarkawis. I am simply sick of hearing this nonsense and used WW2 as a parallel. You should read what people write and respond accordingly.

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

Monday, 09 June 2008

All comments thus far miss the point. He does not recognize the US military court and would prefer to die a martyr to draw more attention to his misguided cause . Its not like he's pleading not guilty he's being defiant to the end.

Posted by: slick 6, WA

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

Dont forget this is one of our judiciary, the one who told a young offender that is was ok to use foul language to Police... susan lawe, gippsland on Pat O'Shane escapes drink driving conviction

I must say though Geoff that it was rather strange that none of the Liberal Govt polies new anything about the Australian wheat board paying... Pierce B, Vic on Pat O'Shane escapes drink driving conviction

While that comment about Godfreys guarantee is quite hillarious, I think you should go and listen to your beloved Justin Timberlake, as your taste in... B MC, Perth on The week at LIVENEWS.com.au

Are you kidding??? You want Bird's employer to take some resposibility for what Bird does in his own time??? No teenager or adult... Paula Cummins, Brisbane on Greg Bird's sister blames Sharks for star's downfall

The drink driving issue ,that is.... Pierce B, Vic on Pat O'Shane escapes drink driving conviction