Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 04 December 2008

Rudd gets six minutes to make difference on climate change

8/07/2008 7:22:00 AM.  | John Barrington & AAP
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will push for a global emissions trading scheme, as he attends the annual G8 summit of world leaders in Japan.

Record food and oil prices and of course climate change will dominate talks at the Group of Eight Summit to be held on the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido.

Kevin Rudd is representing Australia for the first time, and Labor's election promise for an emissions trading scheme by 2010 will be at the forefront of his agenda.

Mr Rudd will have just six minutes to be the human blowtorch Brendan Nelson wants him to be on climate change.

That's the speaking time allocated for leaders at a gathering of major greenhouse emitters the prime minister will take part in on Wednesday.

Accompanied by Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, Mr Rudd will lobby for global commitments on emissions trading, particularly from China and India.

Greens Leader Bob Brown says Mr Rudd must represent Australia as a world leader on emissions trading, despite claims at home that other countries must act first.

“Our injunction to Kevin Rudd is to join with those others at G8 who want to tackle climate change and give this world security rather than a mess."

The Opposition has warned the PM not to waste the opportunity, after refusing to support an ETS without a worldwide initiative.

Mr Rudd is also scheduled to meet with the Japanese Prime Minister on the final day of the summit.

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

Mr Rudd speaking style is so full of blather, waffle and repeatitive words that it will take him 6 minutes to finish the first sentence

Posted by: Mike Dennis, Bella Vista

 

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

I love the way Brengun and co demand action from Rudd, NOW. The Lib-Nats spent over a decade doing everything they could to delay action on Climate Change. They undermined every effort and argued that there was no problem because they are in bed with the polluters. Now, they DEMAND action, not just hypocrites, but IGNORANT and OBVIOUS HYPOCRITES. Has Nelson no sense of shame?

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

Graeme Henderson-We are still waiting for your list of the environmental achievements of Messers Hawke and Keating-they had a longer time than the Coalition to do something-have a good day.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

1. Howard did nothing on climate change becasue he had no money left after paying for billions of debt in loans. 2. He was also an old stodgey guy (like half the people on this site) who was out of touch with the concepts of environmentalism (but his party weren't). 3. Despite the above, he still made sure we WERE on target to meet Kyoto (even though he didn't sign it), AND he tried to fix the Murray-Darling, and he had a plan for the future.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

Hey Completely Loony, He had millions of dollars for political, 'Unchain your heart' type adds, using money as an excuse for his backward attitude lack sincerity, I guess that's why you don't use your name eh? Howard's plan for the future, what a laugh, just a last ditch attempt to get votes. Back to money, Tax breaks for the rich, refusal to lower petrol excise, increasing his pay, the Pacific Solution. It wasn't money, Howard hates the environment, the Libs are all like that.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

I absolutley agree - Howard has never supported any environmental issues. JH was the leader of the liberal party becasue he was a strong leader, but he was not the entire party. To say that all liberals are the same is simply ignorant. You don't know me, I DO believe in environmental issues, & I practice what I preach (unlike many). I don't use my name because I often use examples from my family & friends & it allows them to stay anonymous.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

I do believe in environmentalism, I believe we should take care of the planet for moral reasons & to me the "global warming" debate is irrelevent, Pollution is pollution! The thing about carbon trading - IT DOES NOT WORK. Nationally, it allows pollutors to simply purchase more carbon credits from those that do the right thing. Internationally it simply allows for the exploitation of the third world by the west, as rich companies in the West buy the credits of the poor third world companies.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

Folks please have an objective look at the thrust of this story. Rudd and Wong want developing Countries like China and India to commit to emission trading. This is going to make things harder for them to grow their economy. They have a long, long way to go before they can achieve a comparable per capita income with the West. So they are being asked to make very significant sacrifices, When Rudd was faced with high petrol prices he wanted to take a blow torch to the belly of the oil producing cartels to get them to lift their production. If he was sincere about emissions and sacrifices he should have asked the Cartel to cut back even more so that we would use less.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

You are going to get hammered for your last statement about petrol prices. I know I copped it when i said the same thing a month ago - we have cheap petrol, there's no need to reduce it. We use cars to much & we are a fat & lazy nation that needs to get off its arses & walk some more. Re China, I take your point but they are one country that are actually introducing some incredibly tough environmental laws, they're taking their responsibilities very seriously (more than us).

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Tuesday, 08 July 2008

Brendan Nelson says we should wait for a global carbon trading scheme before we make economic sacrifices and start soon. We should set an example for the world and start now! As one of the biggest per capita ghg emitters in the world, we have a duty to start. As one of the world leading economies, we need to take a leading role. We should not impose sacrifices on the standard of living of lesser economies.

Posted by: Vivienne Ortega, Heidelberg Heights

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Rudd's further leg of the Great Ego Trip has given him 6 minutes of "fame" for no recognition since the decision is already made prior. What is the cost of the trip for Rudd and his considerable entourage, and wouldn't this be better spent on something real? Like an increase on pensions to help combat the cost rises that will come from a $21/week rise to boost his Trade Union support.

Posted by: Dennis Bradney, Mission Beach

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

Keep Bird sack Stuart. if his behaviour after the world cup game was anything to go by, you can understand the behaviour of his charges.... Nick Again, Maryborough on Crunch time: Bird buoyed, but fans divided

Better not use Black pen, Aboriginals might get upset. Better not use Yellow pen, Asians might get upset. Better not use any pen. They are all doomed... Mitch OMatic, Sydney on Teachers told not to use 'aggressive' red pen

Once a glasser always a glasser. It's like once crook always a crook. Goodbye and good ridence, let's move on... Joe Gatt, Blacktown on Crunch time: Bird buoyed, but fans divided

Sack him. This rubbish about being elected by the people protecting them is a Joke. if he cant do the job, flick him.As for the... Nick Again, Maryborough on Senator Conroy busted snoozing in Parliament

It would not hurt to breath test politicians. Why not ? They should not be affected by alcohol at work. It is a sackable offence... Frank Rizzo, Sydney on No need to breath-test MPs: Della Bosca