Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 04 December 2008

Forget petrol tax, we need greener cars: NRMA

13/07/2008 3:15:00 PM.  | Richard Maxton and Yoni Bashan
A new petrol tax could be introduced to help tackle climate change, but the country's peak motoring body wants a different approach.

The Rudd government's Green Paper on climate change will be released next week, providing another blueprint to address the problem and where petrol should fit in.

Climate change minister Penny Wong says motorists will know where they stand by Wednesday.

"The Green Paper will make clear the direction the government is taking on climate issues."

In the meantime the NRMA thinks fuel consumption has become the problem.

NRMA President Alan Evans says Australia could save $10 billion a year if Australian car manufacturers did more to meet the emission standards being set overseas.

"The Rudd government should make it compulsory from now on that cars meet compulsory Fuel consumption standards and emission standards.

"They're manufacturing the engines in Europe, Japan and the US to meet the compulsory standards there.

"So the technology's available, the equipment's available, it's just in Australia they've been allowed to slip by.

"The standards in Australia are such that not they're not green enough to even sell in China."

COMMENTS

Sunday, 13 July 2008

And fix up public transport in the cities, make it free, and ban the ownership of private cars in cities. If the money spent on tunnels had been spent on public transport then the amount of fuel used in Australia would be much lower already. Get private cars off the streets and public transport will be much faster and it will free up huge amounts of space.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Monday, 14 July 2008

I had an HR Holden with a 186 red motor, good for 32mpg.= 8l/100k. 1964 technology with spit n dribble carb and vaccum advance. The equal today is a v6 commodore that barely gets 12l/100 k real driving. WHY? what happened to the technology when it got so clever that a car is useless at fuel economy? We keep getting told about ALL new design. 5l/100k should be the target economy of all family cars of today. we dont need a ford focus pushing more HP. than a brock Commodore of the 80's. Economy!

Posted by: Nick Again, maryborough

 

Monday, 14 July 2008

perhaps the NRMA should be asking why a falcon/Commodore chew up 11l/100k instead? With the Advent of computerised timing/fuel injection, it's a farce to see such abysmal fuel consumption. Is it mandatory yet for all diesel vehicles to use scrubbers on the Exhaust? this would pull pollution from them down alot. All cars have become high powered with no economy, where is the call to lower performance for the gain of economy? Time for the NRMA and Co. to get real too!!

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

The trouble is that players come into first grade when they're 16, 17 years old and generally get put into a house away from their... Luke Roberts, Leumeah on NRL preparing to ban Reni Maitua

And once again we get treated like herd animals. The ISI in known to do bussiness with the "Terror cells" in the back lands of... Nick Again, maryborough on Grief turns to anger on the streets of Mumbai

Convict stock all of you, look at your own heritage..losers... D T, Surry Hills on Rolf Harris offends Aboriginal community with risque comments

What a bunch of typical aussie scum rednecks..your the ones who should be paying rent..get your heads out of your arses losers..... D T, Surry Hills on Rolf Harris offends Aboriginal community with risque comments

Now this is the sort of person who should be given the Nobel Peace Prize; not fraudulant environmentalists like Al Hore.... Fair Minded Aussie, Australia on Boy's arm amputated via SMS instruction after hippo attack