Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Tuesday, 02 December 2008

Government won't rush agriculture into emissions scheme

5/08/2008 11:29:00 AM.  | AAP
The Rudd government says it will not rush to include agriculture in its emissions scheme despite a report warning forest clearing poses a much bigger threat than previously thought.

Australian National University (ANU) researchers say they have evidence showing Australia's native forests store the equivalent of 25.5 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases.

But they say the carbon storage levels are three times more than previously thought, meaning forest clearing had the potential to see much more carbon emitted into the atmosphere.

Trees consume carbon dioxide when they grow, which they store. If the trees are chopped down, the carbon is released as carbon dioxide.

Despite the latest findings, Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the government would not be rushing to include agriculture in its carbon pollution reduction scheme.

"Questions of sequestration, forests, how we deal with our sequestration, particularly in terms of coal-fired power stations, they're important issues to discuss and work through, but in the meantime we really want to get on with it," Mr Garrett told Sky News.

"By delivering, frankly, a really comprehensive program which includes renewable energy targets, a billion dollars I announced in the budget in terms of energy efficiency measures in the household ... we're starting to get on the road to actually deal with climate change."

The ANU report would be considered as the government continued to address climate change.

"We've laid out through the green paper a process of discussion about these issues ... and this is another report which contributes (to that process)," Mr Garrett said.

"One thing I would say about it is this - we have the opportunity with the carbon pollution reduction scheme as proposed by the government, to get on the path to reducing emissions."

COMMENTS

Tuesday, 05 August 2008

Agriculture is responsible for about 16% of our greenhouse gases, but they produce the most powerful ones, especially methane from livestock. Nitrous oxide is an even more potent greenhouse gas and comes from animal poo and from land clearing. The loss of forests for livestock is also part of the emission increase. Leaving agriculture out of the ETS would be to leave out one of the biggest drivers of atmospheric warming.

Posted by: Vivienne Ortega, Heidelberg Heights

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

IMHO, the whole lot of them carry on like a group of Bitchy cats...A very sad predicamentfor our pollitics and a very shamefull display to... Nick Again, Maryborough on Julie Bishop defends Question Time 'clawing'

susan women are looking at the ceiling wondering when their husband is going to get around to painting it. or working out the shopping list.... Belinda Hummie, New lambton on Giant orgasm planned for late December

Andy Shaver, Wes doing a country album are you for real ?.Wes does and sings what Sony BMG says. He may have the versatility to... S lick, WA on Hit or miss? Media confusion over Wes Carr single sales

Typical Union crap..." stand over boys". Now Russ Colleson, Dont be hard on the KRUDD man, he's doing Exactly what he said he would....destroy... Nick Again, Maryborough on Building workers demand end of watchdog

So, Tom and Katie get to be sisters?... Gleg Muckmellow, Metropolis on Bizarre ceremony set to merge Cruise and Beckham