Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 20 November 2008

Nuclear debate heats up in Queensland

21/08/2008 7:50:00 PM.  | AAP
Queensland will need nuclear energy more than any other state in Australia, says former Telstra chief Ziggy Switkowski.

Mr Switkowski, who chairs the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, launched The Australia Nuclear Association Queensland (ANAQ) in Brisbane this evening.

He said the need for cleaner energy was more urgent in Queensland because of the state's population growth.

"Queensland's economy is booming; its appetite for electricity is growing faster than any other state in Australia," he said.

"It's going to have to make decisions earlier than other states in terms of what the next generation of power plants are going to be.

"Given 90 per cent of electricity comes from fossil fuel and in the future we can't use fossil fuels, at least not to the same extent, the creation of this group to stimulate an objective debate about nuclear power makes a lot of sense."

The ANAQ has five corporate members including stockbroking firm ABN AMRO Morgans and 13 individuals ranging from lawyers to engineers.

Association secretary Kate Holmes said the aim was to crank up the nuclear debate but she did not see the association as a lobby group.

"Nuclear energy has been going for 50 years but not many people know much about it," the Brisbane lawyer said.

"The idea is to be an education forum to help educate people on the pros and cons of nuclear energy."

Dr Switkowski said nuclear power was used in 31 countries and Australia would soon have to look at it as a viable alternative to fossil fuels.

He said the ban on uranium mining in Queensland was contentious.

"There is no logic I can see for Queensland to not develop uranium reserves," he said.

The former Chief Executive Officer of Telstra was appointed by the Commonwealth Government to chair an inquiry into the viability of nuclear power in Australia in 2006.

COMMENTS

Friday, 22 August 2008

Not a lobby group, just another lie by these people. Switkowski is paid to promote this industry, and this new group is designed to make a profit for the vested interests. Australia should stop mining Uranium and these pro nuclear people need to be sent to Chernobyl to clean up that mess first.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Friday, 22 August 2008

Graeme Henderson- And you should be sent to China and India where you will be kept permanently afloat in the atmosphere to clean up all the Carbon that our Coal is spewing up. Do you know any one in Public life that does not have a vested interest? I withdraw the question because you will probably come up with some untruth.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Friday, 22 August 2008

Des, The one thing I know is that Howard and his dishonest mates in the Nuclear Industry aimed to delay any action in dealing with Climate Change in the hope that if things became desperate enough they could frighten people into supporting Nuclear Power. This was predicted two decades ago. If they are fooling you well I'm not surprised, They know that there are plenty of dumb people and plenty of cowards out there, they supported Howard in the past. Some still do! The dumb cowards that is.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Friday, 22 August 2008

Graeme Henderson-You do not understand the facts so you engage in useless name calling and emotional arguments. Show me the evidence taht Global Warmng is man made.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Friday, 22 August 2008

Anyone scared of nuclear should study physics. There's nothing wrong with it as an energy. Chernobyl was unfortunate and most likely a result of bad management but France and America manage their nuclear plants just fine and have done for decades.

Posted by: Andy Robbins, Sydney

 

Friday, 22 August 2008

Andy Robbins, Sydney, Unfortunate? Get your butt over there and clean it up. Three Mile Island was well managed was it, you of course mean the cover up and not the reactor. Recent cases in Japan also come to mind as well as examples of contamination around the world. The entire industry has continually covered up mistakes and pollution. If the nuclear industry was honest it may be trusted, but if it was honest it would be closed down.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Friday, 22 August 2008

Desmond, I can't possibly show you that Climate Change is man made anymore than I can show you that the world is round. I can however prove that Nuclear Power is dangerous. I can PROVE that Nuclear Disasters are insanely expensive and beyond human kinds ability to fix. I can also say without doubt that Nuclear Power is very very expensive. I can PROVE that John Howard is a liar. Mostly though Desmond the fact is that I regard you as too stupid to comprehend any of this. Luckily you are irrelevant.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

Well at last some good news. Hopefully when Obama takes over in the USA we will get to the bottom of this travesty of justice.... Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs on No new control order for Hicks: AFP

Eddy Groves was just too greedy in the end he was doing fine in Australia until wanting to expand in the US and then the... Fair Dinkum ,, , on Private child-care fails our kids

Bring back Club Veg. The best ever radio show!... Sarah Tighe, Sydney on CONFIRMED: Ugly Phil and Sami Lukis to take over breakfast at Triple M

Why don't they just give every child who is eliglble for a bus pass now, Ten "Travel Ten" tickets per term. Thats Ten journeys a... Di cole, parramatta on School transport scheme a 'recipe for educational disaster'

Thank you Geoffrey. I think you read me accurately. I guess Tim had to bite, or accept that his jaundiced position had been undermined by... Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney on Private child-care fails our kids