Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

Absence makes baby's brain grow softer: Call for two years paid maternity leave

3/09/2008 7:33:00 AM.  | Gillian Cannon

The push for paid maternity leave has been stepped up with evidence a baby's brain development is hampered by a mother's absence.

The one-on-one interaction between a mother and baby appears irreplaceable, with research showing a mother's absence can be detrimental to brain development.

According to the state's leading advisor on child policy, Gillian Calvert, mothers should be paid to stay at home for the first two years.

Ms Calvert told News Ltd the core capacities from the interactions with a mother underpin a child's entry into language and logical thinking.

"When a baby smiles at its mother she leans over and kisses the baby, who then grabs her cheek, each interaction building upon the next," Ms Calvert said.

She says the scientific evidence is compelling.

"We have evidence that maternal employment during an infant's first year of life can have a detrimental effect on their cognitive development," she said. 

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Why should tax payers pay mothers to do what they should be doing anyway. If they do bring it in, it should be means tested like the baby bonus. A lot of parenting is about sacrifices and putting your childs needs first. I know mothers that would take the paid maternity leave and then hire a nanny to look after the baby so they can still go for their coffees and lunches. This isnt fair on the stay at home mums that have decided to make do on one income for the sake of their children they get 0

Posted by: Jennifer T, Bulli

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

How about not having a baby unless you can stay home with them in the first 2 /5 years. This rubbish amazes me..WHO is going to pay , the taxpayer, or the employer..I didnt get taxpayer/employer funded time off when I had my children, why do some today think taxpayers should pay for you to have children? Im sure the employers arn't going to pay for the leave and have to hire another for the 2 years...recipe for not employing young females I would say. Another slug for the taxpayer.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

What about the Mothers that are not in the work force when they have a baby? They will be discriminated against because they will be missing out on two years wages. Typical Socialist ideas-carve up the economic cake without giving a dam about making the cake.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

I think the 3 months paid maternity leave is ok (compared to what our parents and grad parents had). The government can help: less tax for the father and the baby bonus is good. The government can only do so much. The generation these days want everything on a silver plate. That’s not how life is. Ms Calvert, scientific evidence is too slow & not gud enough. Eg, only recently it was accepted that pregnancy is 10 months and not 9, we have know this for ever.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

The best method is common sense & the need for education. Again why r we spending time & money on science (researching) something that we already know & just need to make the right choices. What has happened to us humans beings? Why r our priorities so wrong? Why cant we see what’s in front of us, learn from the wise people around us & from our past? 1 of the answers is right type of education & up bringing.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

I think the 3 months paid maternity leave is ok (compared to what our parents and grad parents had). The government can help: less tax for the father and the baby bonus is good. The government can only do so much. The generation these days want everything on a silver plate. That’s not how life is. Ms Calvert, scientific evidence is too slow & not gud enough. Eg, only recently it was accepted that pregnancy is 10 months and not 9, we have know this for ever.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

The best method is common sense & the need for education. Again why r we spending time & money on science (researching) something that we already know & just need to make the right choices. What has happened to us humans beings? Why r our priorities so wrong? Why cant we see what’s in front of us, learn from the wise people around us & from our past? 1 of the answers is right type of education & up bringing.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Guys our belief (very briefly): It starts with the parents. Their thoughts, deeds, habits, behaviour, the company they keep i.e. the common day 2 day things. Education & the child’s future begin inside the mother’s womb & not only after birth. Around 7 months, the brain starts forming inside the already formed body. So now everything that goes around the mother, child can hear it & see it and hence starts his/her education.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Very briefly: How often do u wonder how a child turned out this way or that way. MOST (not all) of it is due to the ignorance or negligence of the parents, but some of it is due to the childs own deeds.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Before pointing a finger at some one (IN THIS CASE, government), every person needs to realise this, there is 1 pointing out and 3 pointing in (back towards u). Look at u’re self 1st before blaming others YES as parents we need to look at how we r raising the child before blaming someone else.

Posted by: Ashween Lakhan, Rooty Hill

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Ashwen I have no problem with 3 months paid maternity, but like you, I see the greed of others..given 3 mnths, now they want more. Having children is a priviledge, not a right that others should have to pay for. Stay at home Mothers get no financial encouragement to do so, but they do it, because they want the best for the child THEY decided to give birth to. Tighten your belts and live on one wage for the babies first years,or dont have them..Many young couples do it, without tax subsidies.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

'ave, 'ave you been talking to my missus?... Opinionated JWH Party, Australia on Fans evacuate Andre Rieu Brisbane concert after severe storm

Rudd's policies keep contradicting themselves. At the one end of the pendulum, you have Rudd guaranteeing all bank deposits for the next 3 years... Aurora Australis, Melbourne, http://aurora-australis.proboards.com on Will we spend or save Rudd's billions?

Lol @ Adrian. If you went to a Catholic school and didn't have the Australian Anthem, you must have had your school confused with something... susan lawe, wherever on Islamic school denies banning National Anthem

How refreshing, for a bloke who has been wedged in the Rodent's coinslot for the past 12 years, you show a rare appreciation for the... darren carrow, brisbane on Turnbull under leadership cloud as senators rebel

Andy Mac-And wait there’s more. Remember the way Rudd and his cronies used to criticise the Coalition for what they called 'Political Advertising’. Now they... Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill on Kevin Rudd spends $600,000 on travel