Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

Wong rejects second Murray River rescue option

3/09/2008 12:44:00 PM.  | AAP
Federal Water Minister Penny Wong appears to have rejected a second rescue option for the Murray River's ailing lower lakes.

Her department has told a parliamentary inquiry there is enough water in the southern storages of the Murray-Darling Basin to save the lower lakes from acidification in the medium-term.

But buying that water and sending it downstream would cost up to $1 billion in lost production, and put at risk $5 billion in permanent plantings, it said.

"We really do have to ensure we retain permanent plantings in areas such as the Riverland for example," Senator Wong told ABC Radio today.

"But what we will do is continue to purchase permanent allocations from willing sellers that give these communities, these irrigators, time to adjust."

Buying out permanent licences - the rights to a share of future water - is a different concept to buying out water which actually exists and has already been allocated.

Senator Wong has rejected another rescue option canvassed by the department - buying water from the Menindee Lakes on the Darling River in western NSW.

"It would be irresponsible to release that water," she said.

But she has left open a third option - flooding the lower lakes with seawater - a proposal opposed by conservationists.

"No one wants to have to make that decision," she said.

The department says the lower lakes have until at least February next year before urgent action must be taken to save them.

"At the moment we are in a holding pattern," Senator Wong said.

"There are no easy options when it comes to the Murray-Darling Basin, there are only hard choices."

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

If only the Federal Gov had started to deal this ten years ago when it was obvious that the river system was in big trouble. It's obviously Swan and Rudds fault though.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Fair go Graeme,isnt about time you stopped blaming Rudd and Swan??????????

Posted by: Pierce B, Vic

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Aw, but, ah, but, golly Pierce, I hadn't looked at it like that. OK.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Question: When did the climate ever stop changing??? Point: We take water from the Murray, use it crops > send the crops to the city or abroad > piss the water from the crops in the toilet > send the water to the sea. WHAT DID U EXPECT???? For it to magically apear in the river again!

Posted by: Ray Pro, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

No hendo it is not Rudds and Swan's fault, it's a greedy Queensland Governments fault that sold water rights to the cotton and rice growers...do you think that no one else in Australia knows about this...

Posted by: keith rowland, tweed heads

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

Well Keith, I guess they are just trying to catch up on all that water that NSW uses. Even now all that Queensland uses is bugger all. Personally I think all the water allocations should simply be cut to 25% of their current amounts with no compensation, and that water should not be harvested until after the flood peak has gone through. Business affected should have done more research to ascertain if their business was viable. State Labor sucks though, no argument there, NSW as well.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

hendo, if there's no water coming down it can't be used or abused...like your idea about the allocations being cut by 25% though....

Posted by: keith rowland, tweed heads

 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008

It's not that simple, free flowing, only 20% of the water at most, that should flow into the Great Southern Ocean, comes from Queensland. But I see the Condamine R regularly, and it's disgusting, they suck it dry in no time. Most of the rice and cotton is in NSW though. This is why the States can't be allowed to control these things. The States are only looking after themselves and Qld says that if NSW only took as much water as Qld does there would be no problem. Get rid of the states maybe?

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

'ave, 'ave you been talking to my missus?... Opinionated JWH Party, Australia on Fans evacuate Andre Rieu Brisbane concert after severe storm

Rudd's policies keep contradicting themselves. At the one end of the pendulum, you have Rudd guaranteeing all bank deposits for the next 3 years... Aurora Australis, Melbourne, http://aurora-australis.proboards.com on Will we spend or save Rudd's billions?

Lol @ Adrian. If you went to a Catholic school and didn't have the Australian Anthem, you must have had your school confused with something... susan lawe, wherever on Islamic school denies banning National Anthem

How refreshing, for a bloke who has been wedged in the Rodent's coinslot for the past 12 years, you show a rare appreciation for the... darren carrow, brisbane on Turnbull under leadership cloud as senators rebel

Andy Mac-And wait there’s more. Remember the way Rudd and his cronies used to criticise the Coalition for what they called 'Political Advertising’. Now they... Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill on Kevin Rudd spends $600,000 on travel