Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 03 December 2008

Henson under fire over school model scout

4/10/2008 8:04:00 PM.  | AAP
Controversial artist Bill Henson has yet again come under fire from the nation's "outraged" and "revolted" politicians, this time following revelations he went to a primary school to search for suitable subjects for his artwork.
   
In a book by journalist David Marr, Mr Henson said a Melbourne primary school principal agreed to let him wander the playground at lunchtime, accompanied by the principal, in search of subjects for his artwork.
   
"If the report is accurate, I am disgusted by it," Prime Minister Kevin Rudd told reporters in Sydney today.
   
"I think parents would be revolted and horrified if this were true."
   
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull said he was outraged by the report.
   
"There are very big issues here relating to the protection of children, their privacy and informed consent," he told reporters in Sydney.
   
"The matters that have been described in the media are totally inappropriate and unacceptable and I share the outrage that has been expressed by many people at these events," he said.
   
"I'm astounded by the reports."
 
Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan said it was the ultimate betrayal of parents' trust and someone ought to be sacked.
   
Mr Marr said Mr Henson was accompanied by the school principal at all times and he did not tell the children he wanted them to model for him or take any photographs.
   
"The only contact with the photographer was if the parents of the children wished to talk to him," he told Sky News.
   
"The impression has been put about by Senator Heffernan and by others that he kind of roamed, roamed the playground unsupervised, perhaps interviewing children, perhaps photographing children.
   
"That is not the case. The impression that he is sort of loose in the playground is actually factually wrong."
   
Mr Henson told Mr Marr he mostly found his subjects through friends or friends of friends.
   
He said there had never been an occasion where a subject had become distressed immediately after a sitting, but conceded there may have been occasions when he had made mistakes.
   
"There must have been a few errors of judgment in 35 years of work, where I photographed someone who in retrospect has gone, 'I wish I didn't do that'," Mr Henson said in an edited excerpt of Mr Marr's book published in the Fairfax press today.
   
In May, the prime minister bought into the controversy surrounding the NSW police seizing Mr Henson's photographs from a gallery.
   
"I find them absolutely revolting," he said of the pictures.
   
"Kids deserve to have the innocence of their childhood protected. I have a very deep view of this. For God's sake, let's just allow kids to be kids," he said at the time."
   
Mr Rudd also attacked Mr Henson's work after a 2003 picture of a naked Olympia Nelson, aged six, was splashed across the front cover of Art Monthly Magazine.
   
"Frankly, I can't stand this stuff," he said.

COMMENTS

Saturday, 04 October 2008

The stalking lowlife paedophile at least he shows up what some people are, namely the very small minority of sicko's who support him.Well even Hitler had supporters, but this creep is lower than that, just absolute lowlife scum. Bloody art indeed.

Posted by: Alex Uren, Luddenham

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

guess which opposition leader, aka a sicko, has TWO of hensons pieces? MALCOM TURNBULL. i wont be voting for him

Posted by: dead zemanak, redfern

Saturday, 04 October 2008

OMG, that is disgusting. i never knew that turnbull had 2 henson pieces & i for one will not be voting for him, the Libs never again.By this i can only be certain that he condones paedophilia! Outrageous! Jeeves get me Downer on the phone...

Posted by: dead zemanak, newport

Saturday, 04 October 2008

It's a sign of sickness when you start answering yourself too !

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

If I had kids in that school I'd be mightily peed off with the Principal!! How dare he parade those kids without them knowing it and more importantly, their parents knowing it. I hope he gets a good swift kick in the backside for his disrespectful and thoughtless actions

Posted by: Peter C, Sydney

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Hang on a minute bottom feeder; you are the same one who slandered me with every word over one syllable you could think of for me saying the Henson photos were only the tip of the ice berg and he encouraged paedophiles; now you are holier than thou. You are the same one who said you would be overjoyed if I was raped; all because I dared to say Henson was wrong. What did you think would happen next? You are an utter and Despicable Hypocrite. The very mention of your name reminds me of vomit.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Sunday, 05 October 2008

James, James, James, I said love, I said pet, I said pet, I said love, I said James. My problem with your original insipid rant was your views on censorship, a nong like you has no business telling me or anyone else what they can look at. I know I only made that crystal clear about five time, so you probably didn't pick that up. The mere mention of YOUR name James, makes me want to burst out laughing, but that's what you get for caring.

Posted by: Peter C, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Peter.C. you are ranting like a Jack the Ripper of Cyber Space. You said you would be overjoyed for me to be raped; yet you do not see any form on mental illness in this statement. It WILL only be a matter of time before you take your Deranged ideas to the next level. Get Some Help. Live News should have reported you to the authorities immediately; this is not the thoughts of a normal person. YOU are the reason why Henson style photos should never be allowed

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Continued: for the record; the principle should have more than his backside kicked. This is promoting Child Abuse and should be dealt with by the courts. In NSW State Schools it is actually illegal to let ANY Person into a school once there has been ANY form charges involving children; proven or otherwise. I was a Teacher for 10 years and every year you must do a Child Protection Course; you are also obligated by law to report this very sort of activity. This is a NSW Government requirement.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Sunday, 05 October 2008

James, I feel sorry for you, get back on your medication a soon as possible, remember, your psychiatrist is trying to help you. If you won't do it for yourself or your family, then do it for me!! While I'm about it, if you have a problem with the disciplining of that Principal take it up with Victorian Education Dept., not me. A normal person wouldn't need to be told that James. So what did you teach anyway, "Being a @#%$&^ 101"????

Posted by: Peter C, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Peter; like every NSW teacher; I have had my past investigated and mine came up clean; unlike how your past would look. I left teaching after 10 years because it was time for a change; and not under a cloud as you might like to think. What I taught is not of your concern. I can asure you of this; The Child Protection Act is drummed into every NSW State teacher. Under the act; as a teacher; we are obligated to report the behaviour of Henson and yourself; this is a statutory requirement in NSW.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Sunday, 05 October 2008

I am so incredibly relieved that you are a former teacher James. Much damage has doubtless been done, but at least you are not still at it.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Monday, 06 October 2008

Well said Darren, my thoughts exactly.

Posted by: Peter C, Sydney

Monday, 06 October 2008

Peter and Darren; In an age where there is such a concerted to stamp out child pornography and abuse; you two imbo's take it upon your selves to make unfounded personal attacks on people who support the effort. There can only be one reason for these attacks; that is because it is hitting a raw nerve. Darren; the reason I left teaching of of no concern to you; nor does it warrant your gutter trash comments. You both carry on like Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber. GO AND GET HELP FOR YOUR DISEASE.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Monday, 06 October 2008

Actually James, the foundation for my relief is twofold: a) your spelling and grammar are substandard, and while I nromally don't get pedantic on here (we all throw a dodgy keystroke occasionally) it is a concern for a chalkie, and b) your political and ideological views are very extreme, and you are evidently incapable of expressing them coherently, or backed by reasoned argument. Some semblance of balance and restraint is a requirement in those who teach the young.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

James: You didn't have to prove anything but you make it interesting when you show these two up every time - goes to show you have a lot more sense than two of them put together! It's mandatory reporting and a requirement as you state by law and that unfortunately is taken very lightly the reason why DOCS is under current investigation - simpletons like these two just have no idea! It would be interesting to know what these two jackass have ever contributed to community service except to make inane and unflattering comments towards others! This is an absolute disgrace that this was allowed and to condone the idea is just not acceptable. All Teachers, have a responsibility to the community and this Principal has stepped outside the boundary of the code of ethics.

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

RS; I find it bizarre that Darren calls my views extreme when he himself stated this in another feed "as a theorist who built on Marx'.Marx was off the planet with his views and this goose is a self confessed theorist who built on these off the planet views.These two bozo's consider themselves educated because they can count all 7 dwarves on one hand.Their assumption is incorrect; this is not education; it is from too many in their family sharing the same gene pool.Duelling Banjos sums them up!!

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

James, it looks like you missed out on the whole suite of R's champ. If you looked at my comment carefully, and had basic comprehension skills, you would notice that I was describing Gramsci as a theorist who buitl on Marx. Your shrill abuse has doen nothing to meet my points and simply reinforces my view that the kids of Australia are advantaged by you career change.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

James: For someone to point out bad grammer it is indeed not surprising that the likes of Darrow can even show himself to be sooooo perfect.Carrow made the following statement with the incorrect punctuation however it's the statement that is so amusing "I asked you for specifics because, as a theorist who built on Marx, it is my view that Gramsci would not find anything in modern Australian schooling which he would be likely to view as consistent with his thought." No Carrow what you should have said is "I asked you for specifics, because as a theorist Gramsci in my view etc........" usually people who make mistakes own up to them - unfortunately you can't even do that!

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

RS & James, Carren sees to blurt out an abundance of verbal diarrhea over numerous blogs (I've seen about 12!). My guess is that he doesn't/hasn't/can't work, but boy can he crap on!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

RS and Geoff; I find it interesting that Peter and Darren can actually get their say on this site. To submit their comment, they must agree to the terms below. which means they must agree to: 7. In its use of the website, a user must not: -defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise offend others; Between these two they have done the lot. I posted a comment on Henson and then it all started; with venim. The Moderator is not doing their job properly; they should be terminated.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

James & RS, re "Moderator", the standard appears flexible. The site has "mongrels" that they seem to favour (like Henderson who can abuse anyone, call then Nazis etc etc), and others that offer moderate opinions with the odd bit of flamboyance, that get regularly chopped. I'm often in the latter catogory when I either (a) add something that supports say Desmond Harris or (b) criticise Henderson and his extreme "left" wing mates. Maybe they should be called the IRREGULATOR??

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

Geoff; it seems that if they are a supporter of the Lunie Left or Chilp Porn they get a free run to berate anyone they like with what ever gutter trash they like. They don't require reason for the tirades; just the ability to vent their venom at main stream Australia. They can call me anything they like; they can publically state they would be overjoyed if I were raped; yet when I call them rockies; I get culled. The mediators of this site don't seem to know their own terms and conditions.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

RS, I never said my punctuation/grammar (not grammer mate) were perfect, quite the opposite. I did say a chalkie should have higher standards than those displayed consistently by James, who , if he is so hot on clause 7, should be careful not to infer that I am a supported of 'Chilp porn', which is clearly a defamatory imputation. KJames should also be careful about the use of the word 'they' in relation to things Peter C said alone.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Tuesday, 07 October 2008

Geoff, you get a response of your very own. Unlike you, I have not exposed details about my personal education or employment history. You know absolutely nothing about my employability and your guesses about these matters are a sad and desperate attampt to deflect my comments. Your whinging about the moderator falls into the same category. I know you are too gutless to answer a direct question, but here goes: which other blogs have you seen me contribute to? I'm genuinely curious.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Darren: It was really nice while it lasted however I see you can't help yourself - you need to answer a question that relates to this topic for one - sitting on the fence again! - What are your actual opinions on this issue and by the way I'm not your "mate" even if you think that's a term you can just use liberally - stop making assumptions! Geeeeez did I dot the i's and cross the t's and does the spelling meet with your approval? LOL - tell someone who really cares!

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Darren: If you could only read! Didn't James tell you he left teaching - what part is it that you don't get! He is not a chalkie and he doesn't have to be accountable to you or anyone else - since you flout the law so much you should really take your own advice on that issue - your rantings really are out of control to be honest as none of it is relevant to the topic of concern! Answer the question - what is your opinion on this issue?

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Darren; you are the one who linked yourself to Peter.C. when you jumped into something that was of no concern of yours and aligned yourself to him by attacking me.I stand by my original statement;ANY person who publically displays or views provocative photos of naked pre pubescent children IS a paedophile and a pervert.This is what you aligned yourself with. You earned the label for siding with one. Teachers have not used chalk in classrooms for around 30 years; and I did not teach English!

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Please see the thread at http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/10/06/Bill_Hensons_schoolyard_subject_scouting_to_be_raised_in_parliament for my view of this topic. James: your views about guilt by association and your dogmatic take on the subtle issues about artisitic freedom are disturbing. RS: I was expressing my relief about James leaving teaching, a feeling which has deepened after being exposed to his unmoderated attacks.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

The two Henson pieces Turnbull has are not photos of naked children. One is a face in profile and the other is a sunset.

Posted by: A Narchy, The Hills

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Our earwax chewing, pole dancing PM is a man of popularist ideals. I think we can be justifiably synical.

Posted by: gareth benson, blacktown

 

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Is this Graeme from the Darling Downs that writes on here that they are talking about??.lol

Posted by: Pierce B, Vic

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Pierce, I believe Hendo was asked to pose nude - but that was for the Melbourne Comedy Festival!

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

Saturday, 04 October 2008

Gazza; I believe you are correct; they had to renig because they didn't have a wide enough angle lens. Ha, Ha. Actually; for all of the lunatic rantings of Hendo; and we have had our share of Stoushes; I have never seen him stick up for paedophiles or child abusers; he has actually ripped into them. I have never seen his wish harm on anyone either; unlike Peter.C. who gets his rocks off being overjoyed at wishing his fellow human beings get raped. We do need to give credit where it is due.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

Sunday, 05 October 2008

If this Principal escorted this so called "artist' around a primary school yard, knowing he was surveying the children with the intent of photographing one or more of them, naked, he should be sacked immediately. Those who defend this creep need to reassess their intial defence of him. Sickens me thinking he was walking around children in a schoolyard without theirs or their parents permission, sizing them up for a naked photo shoot. PHOTO SHOOT, for me, is a far cry from art.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Monday, 06 October 2008

How about some facts: 1) schools throughout Australia are commonly visited by talent scouts from casting agencies, sports or