Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 03 December 2008

It'll need a big rate cut for banks to pass it on: CommSec

6/10/2008 9:47:00 AM.  | Sarah Wiley & Anil Lambert-Patel

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

Australia's big banks are being urged to explain why they can't pass on any future interest rate cuts in full to customers.

The RBA is widely tipped to slash the official cash rate by as much as 50 basis points tomorrow, but home buyers are only expected to receive a portion of the rate cut.

The Rudd government is not putting pressure on the banks to pass on the full rate reduction, because it says lenders are facing higher borrowing costs as a result of the global financial crisis.

But Shadow Treasurer Julie Bishop has told the ABC the banks must provide details about why they can’t afford to pass on an interest rate cut in full.

“[They must explain] how it would affect their record profitability and how it would affect their operations,” she said.

But CommSec economist Sevanth Sebastian says mortage holders can only expect to see some relief if the RBA takes dramatic action.

“We expect at least 25 basis points worth of rate cuts,” he told LIVENEWS.com.au.

“But you may see the Reserve Bank - if they want the banks to pass on a substantial rate cut – to cut rates by up to 50 basis points.”

COMMENTS

Monday, 06 October 2008

I thought the reason for reducing interest rates was to put liquidity back into the economy? If the banks fail to pass it on, then there is no additional liquidity, other than in the banks coffers? (thanks to Costellofor the inspiration)

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

yes geoff bolton you are correct---however the banks problems are also in part caused by borrowing for share market share purchases, the bailout is a a howard look alike policy that DOES NOTHING for the mum and dad morgage borrowers

Posted by: allan aitchison, melbourne

Monday, 06 October 2008

allan aitchison-Please explain the John Howard reference to the bail out. As far as we know the banks problems are due mainly to the falling home prices in the USA.They lent monies using assets as security and these assets lost value and hence they were left with massive bad debts. The aim of the bail out is to take up the bad debts and free up the Banks so that they could lend money to Businesses and individuals in order to keep the wheels of industry turning. This will be a great help to Mums and Dads. When the economy picks up and the bad debts are recovered the bail out funds will be returned to the public purse. The bail out is not an ideological driven measure but a bipartisan, practical method of averting further damage.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

if the banks are as stable as we keep gettng told, then their reason is "greed". If they arent, then its because they have leveraged beyond their means, just like other banks have, therefore are trying to reset their balances by rorting the public.....Again.

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

Looks like banks call socialise losses and privatise profits. Far enough, too, the farmers have been allowed to do so for decades.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

What about the A$ it's lost 25% recently!!! And what about $20k gov guarantee that's just pathetic... I've sent A$500k to the UK/Ireland for safe keeping. PS: Damn the banks and the usury/fractional reserve lending con game, i mean system.

Posted by: bob dole, sydney

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details

YOUR SAY

I saw a Segway Human Transporter the other day.... Observer JWH Party, Australia on What is the fixie phenomenon?

I agree Damo. They OPEC countries are out to screw us as hard as they can. i hope the scientists find a replacement for oil,... Chanticlere ., Wollongong on Reduce world oil stocks: OPEC president

It's quite painfully obvious that Channel 7 employ very questionable tactics, particularly the news & current affairs division. Chequebook journalism has become an earmark of... Tim Costello, Central Coast on Seven steals Thank God You're Here

LMAO,I heard someone saw a Yetti near Tamworth the other day.He was pure white too .Think it was from being sumerged for awhile in the... Pierce B, Vic on Is this possum the first furry victim of climate change?

If the offer is genuine-no strings attached and no no go areas,including the Afgan border region-India should accept as a first step and take it... Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill on Pakistan offers 'joint investigation' into Mumbai attacks