Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

Akerman Watch: Rudd caused world economic crisis

9/10/2008 3:12:00 PM.  | Tim Brunero
It must be sad to be Piers Akerman. And I’m not just talking about his dinkus.*

I mean it must be sad to be him.

Imagine what it’s like when none of your Tory mates are in power. Suddenly there’s no-one to do your research for you.

After years of neo-fascist propaganda being delivered straight to your inbox from the bilge pumps of the Howard Government to be barely digested before being spewed out into your hate-filled septic slick of a weekly column you have to do some research.

Actually that’s probably not fair. Perhaps having your side of politics without the bother or running the country gives them a lot more time to dig up dirt on their opponents.

Introducing today’s column from Aker-dacker. And dirt there is.

But before it’s time to fling some mud at Rudd, you’ve got to devote at least a few sentences finding him guilty of causing the world economic crisis.

Such a massive job should only take a few.

That’s right, after years of Howard and Bush et al controlling the world economy (and bloody well according to Akers) it turns out it was Rudd who buggered it.

The big man tells us it was Rudd’s sympathisers in the US Congress (The Evil Democrats) who brought in a law years ago that made it easier to give home loans to poor people. Which is why we’re in the mess we’re in.

Of course, exponentially rising executive salaries, a $1 billion a day war in Iraq, destruction of corporate regulation, spiralling credit card debt, and a banking system based on pure destructive greed having nothing to do with it.

It was a few loans to poor people. Oh and guess who was behind that, albeit through some convenient American proxies? That’s right - Big Kev.

So having proven that successfully, Akers still has time to smear the PM.

First he tells us he bought his house on the cheap in some dodgy deal. Then he tells us a “Liberal Party investigation” of Rudd’s finances found he… shock horror… paid some stamp duty late.

Oh then why not repeat some old accusations that Rudd’s wife had underpaid some employees? And fail to mention then were back paid?

But I bet it’s not just sad for us. I bet it’s sad for him as well.

*For those of you who think I’ve gone for an unsubtle penis gag, a dinkus is the little photo next to a writer’s by-line. It was a subtle penis joke.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 09 October 2008

I notice you did not mention Mr. Akerman's crusade re:Heiner Affair. Why was that Tim? Does not fit into you narrative? Or perhaps it's something you don't want to deal with or don't have the courage to. My belief is that the victim at the centre of the Heiner Affair should have her day in Court. What do you think?

Posted by: Naomi C, Blacktown

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Well said Tim!!!!!!

Posted by: Tim Costello, Central Coast

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Brunero, the "facts" regarding Rudd's house activities and his wife's business issues are "facts". So what's your problem....jealousy?

Posted by: gareth benson, Blacktown

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Tim Brunero! I hope you don't get paid for garbage like this? What is all this about? What a waste of time. We don't care what Akerman things or how big is his "dinkus". As a matter of fact we don't care what you think either or wheather you have a "dinkus" at all. I think you are only one notch above the couple of guys who constantly call people names here and have nothing to contribute.

Posted by: Happy Stein, Earlwood

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

"Oh then why not repeat some old accusations that Rudd’s wife had underpaid some employees? And fail to mention then were back paid?" It makes no difference Tim if the people were back paid it was the intent of not paying them correctly in the first place - she obviously had to correct the wrong when she was eventually found out.What Tim forgets in his article when he berates Piers is that Rudd's wife bought out her dead ex-partners business worth more than 5.2 million for only $520,000 (a person ill with cancer for more than 10 years and who had changed her will only two days prior leaving it to her sister as she had no family but was too ill to sign it). Rudd's wife took it all the way to the Supreme Court.Guess who else benefitted from this venture becoming a director in this newly re-named company the infamous Wayne Goss (better known for his part in the Heiner Affair).

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

I read the article. Akerman was spot on, and the placing of words in his mouth is very wide of the mark. It's a bit like saying that Machiavelli's "The Prince" is about authority at all costs. The reduction, or in this articles case the inflation, misrepresents the text in a truth. Rudd is not responsible for the bad things, but he will be. Democrat policy, although lauded, caused this mess. In much the same way lauded Iceland is not a success.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Looks like Tim B. hunting headlines again? That's what he's paid to do. His contribution has nothing to do with reality or truth, its all about "BB @ Live News!"

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Tim, it wasn't just a few loans to poor people. It was artificial discount credit to the multitudes who also showed greed in snuffling up as much monopoly money as they could get. Akerman got it right and you're the sad one because all you can manage is a few blogs when your masters let you.

Posted by: A Narchy, The Hills

 

Thursday, 09 October 2008

Piers, doesn't have to smear the PM goose , every time he opens his mouth up he does it himself, my money is on Piers. It's pretty obvious the truth doesn't sit easy with you Brunero, this idiot Rudd will destroy Australia and lord help America if they do vote in the Democrates, they will be in the same boat as us.

Posted by: Charlotte young, springwood

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

I was most surprised at this article. Why anyone would expect Piers Akerman to be fair, unbiased, balanced or require any form of proof for his statements is totally beyond me. We know his history already. Some journalists have credibility, some are like Piers. Intelligent readers can easily distinguish between the two.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

Friday, 10 October 2008

Micks, like the ABC and its overt "left" bias eh? Or Murdoch's 2007 "anti-Howard" bias eh? We have to live with it, so why don't you?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

Thank you Geoff. You have just gone up considerably in my estimation. Your comments make no attempt to justify Piers, and tacitly admit his outrageous bias. The difference between him and either the ABC or Murdoch, is that occasionally they attack both sides of politics, and often justifiably so. No sane person claims that either side of politics is perfect, far from. That is something that we have never seen from Piers of course.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Hey guys what has happened to Graeme Henderson,has he dissapeared???.He would of been right onto this.I reckon Graeme Henderson is probably Tim Brunero or another Live News Journo incognito.

Posted by: Pierce B, Vic

Friday, 10 October 2008

Pierce...Who cares! And BTW, nowhere has Piers ever said "Rudd caused world economic crisis", this is typical of crap attempts at journalism "opinion" from Tim B.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

That is what I was thinking as well Pierce B. Tim's ideas and writing style is same as Henderson's. I also saw this grafitty on the wall at the warehouse I work at that looked like Tim's style

Posted by: Happy Stein, Earlwood

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Tim-Piers is one of my fellow warriors-why do you have to try to upset him & attack his insightful and unbiased journalism? Surely you can see that it upsets my other hardy stay at home & spend all day attacking any item about anything that can be blamed on not only Mr Rudd, but anybody that is not part of my army of grey hairs? Did you know that Kevin Rudd was the pilot on the Qantas jet in WA? He is also the person responsible for maintenance of that jet?Rally with me-fellow warriors/dribblers

Posted by: Mal T, Bellevue Hill

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Mal, Piers adds balanced to the otherwise distorted world of journalism. What's wrong with that? Not everybody believes all the Rudd spin (read Costa's comments in the Australian)

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

Fair point, well made. I would have to concede that Costa and Ackerman have equal credibility.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

Friday, 10 October 2008

'Piers provides balance to the otherwsie distorted world of journalism', is like saying Mussollini provided balance to thje otherwise distorted world of Continental Eurpean politics. It reminds me of a joke about the parents who went to see their kid graduate from military training, who say 'I don't know about what the other 9,999 are doing, but at least our Johnny is marching in time.'

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Friday, 10 October 2008

Do you realise that Darrow's only contribution to this site is to (try) to negate other entries. Not once have I seen him venture a rational position. According to his latest entry, its is OK to have left bias in journalism, but not anything that disagrees with that position. Next he'll be picking on Andrew Bolt.

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

Darrow (if you have an opinion) what is your take on the Heiner affair cover-up. That's nice and close to home for you? Piers has been active in trying to get justice. What's your position?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

Looks like the hobbyhorse of a particularly conservative redneck One Nation poliie who sat in Qld some years ago. He vowed to have the situation ventilated, but nothing eventuated. Review of prior postings on this site reveals that some contributors, clearly rattled by the popularity of the current PM, have attempted to connect Rudd to the affair because of his position as a Goss advioser at the time. I haven't seen any evidence put forward though.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Friday, 10 October 2008

Darrow, you were asked for an opinion on the Heiner affair? Do you have one or do you prefer to hide behind philosophical rhetoric? I don't recall mentioning Rudd????????

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

Geoff: This the whole point Carrow has no views however berates other people opinions - this was made very clear several posts ago and still fails to answer anything and continues to sit on the fence!!!! Oh and the other thing he has problems reading what people have actually said - a diversionary tactic perhaps but it ain't working!

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney

Saturday, 11 October 2008

You're quite wrong RS. I have made my views on several topics very clear on this site. See my view on Piers below. If you have a question, I'll have a go at answering it, if it is sensible. As for you Geoff, you've run a mile from every question I've put to you. What other sites have you seen me commenting on champ?

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Tim, try looking into the repealing of the " Glass/Steagal" act . this is what gave the banks the power to up the ante on leveraging.This qwas in 1999, dont know if Bush was in then, though this "great rip off" was long in the making. Some could say it goes way back to nixons day? guess that depends on how you see things eh. Now Tim, why arent we hearing about the Food riots that arte happening? Or perhaps the signing of a treaty between the UN/ NATO, which is against the laws of UN charter?

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Tim Brunero? Never heard of him! And the crap that he's penned here is probably why. Piers on the other hand is one hope that we have to expose Rudd and his mob of incompetant morons.

Posted by: Dave Whiteman, Penrith

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

I know that to most lefties truth is an expendable commodity, but if you can pin-point untruths or lies in Ackerman's articles, why not expose them? At least Piers backs up his arguments with some facts and figures but what you have written is typical Labor. Attack and worry about the facts later. I must have missed your article attacking the ABC for their left bias. Sorry I forgot truth plays no part in Labor politics nor Brunero articles.

Posted by: Pete 2, Brisbane

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Well said Tim Brunero - Piers Akerman is one of the most bias journalist I have eve seen.

Posted by: Marilu Lau, Cronulla

Friday, 10 October 2008

Lau, you've obviously led a very sheltered life! I think you mean, Piers is one of the few journalists that fail to subscribe to extreme left wing views? Have you heard of Tony Jones on the ABC? he cuts Turnbull off mid-sentence if Turnbull failes to get dragged off into the lefty wilderness!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 10 October 2008

"The US Congress (The Evil Democrats) who brought in a law years ago that made it easier to give home loans to poor people. Which is why we’re in the mess we’re in." ...Tim this is FACT, read Nicks post then research Glass/Steagall act. Perhaps the left media bias has influenced you , the facts have been so distorted by them I am sure many like yourself, have been fooled into believeing they all speak the truth.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Friday, 10 October 2008

Susan, what planet are you from? The Democrats have only had a majority in Congress since the end of 2007 - and you're trying to blame them for laws that were passed by the Republicans, years ago? lol. Try getting your basic political dates right before you try your mind at political issues...

Posted by: L L, Canberra

 

Friday, 10 October 2008

Tim quotes "Rudd’s sympathisers in the US Congress (The Evil Democrats)" for being to blame. The democrats are often referred to as "liberals"...last time I checked liberals didnt support labor! Our liberal party is made up of liberals (democr and conservatives (republicans). It irritates the hell out of me when commentators HERE lump labor & democrats as the same. Equally irritating is the assumption that all lib voters are conservatives. As for Piers - he is as biased as they come - who cares!

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto