Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 05 December 2008

Why Glenn Stevens still needs the sack

10/10/2008 11:19:00 AM.  | Alan Jones

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

Well at the end of the week and with a one per cent interest rate cut behind us, very significant questions have to be raised about the Reserve Bank and the Governor, Glenn Stevens.

One of the first things Mr Rudd did as Prime Minister was to make a great song and dance about the new independence of the Governor and he had a job for life. You might remember the sickening rigmarole that went on with that.

Yet it's now clear that there was a meeting between the Governor of the Reserve Bank and the Prime Minister last Friday night in Sydney.

Glenn Milne wrote earlier this week that it was understood that the Governor of the Reserve Bank backed the public positions of Mr Rudd and the Treasurer, that because of the higher cost of funds due to the global financial meltdown, banks would be justified in passing on only part of the 1 per cent.

So much, therefore, for the independence of Mr Stevens.

And we've got a Prime Minister and a Treasurer doing a deal with the Governor of the Reserve Bank at the expense of small businesses and battlers in Struggle Street.

So it's clear the commercial banks and the Reserve Bank have been working behind the scenes to soften up the Government and its advisers.

Well let's at the end of the week have a look at this Mr Stevens.

His function at the Reserve Bank is, amongst other things, to contribute to the stability of the currency.

Well, he got it wrong earlier this year when he said we had to attack inflation and that, we were told, was based on runaway demand.

Inflation and rising prices, witness groceries, supermarkets, oil, are a result of a lack of competition, not runaway demand.

The Trade Practices Act could change that.

Indeed, highly paid advisers to the Government were telling us a couple of months ago our dollar would gain parity with the United States.

Suddenly, like a drunk driving out of control who over-corrects to compensate a previous mistake, this week Mr Stevens lowers interest rates by 1 per cent.

So the dollar last week was 81 US cents, then 71 US cents, then 65 US cents.

Today 70.35 US cents. In July it was US 98 cents.

What does this mean?

Well it means the very thing that Stevens was supposed to be addressing, high inflation.

The cost of imports will go up, including petrol.

In fact in less than three months, because of the currency, imports have increased by 50 per cent as our dollar has sunk.

Firms relying on imported goods can't handle these circumstances.

Instability in the currency created by our Reserve Bank will kill off businesses.

Businesses that have Christmas stock ready to arrive from overseas will find their costs up by 50 per cent.

How do they pass them on?

This might be all right for people who gamble on currency movements, who make a big buck from the instability of the currency, but small business would be reeling, and this is because of the erratic and ill-considered policy of the Reserve Bank.

Far from Stevens and his mob being a solution to our economic problems, they're actually putting the economy at risk.

With the plunge in the dollar the price of imported goods will surge, and that means high inflation.

Because of the incompetence of Government that won't change the Trade Practices Act, yet big business will pass every cent of these costs onto you, the consumer.

So now will the RBA increase rates in a futile attempt to control the inflation that they have created.

You've got to ask yourself whether this fellow Stevens has any clues at all.

And in this climate, we now hear that the Reserve Bank, the big four banks and the Government have come to an arrangement over interest rates.

There should be a stewards' inquiry to find out who was selling the dollar over the weekend.

To whom was the 1 per cent information disclosed? Who was given a pre-warning?

Were people selling Aussie dollars at 81 cents and buying them back at 65.

What arrangements were made between our Government and the Reserve Bank?

Surely to God someone's got some explaining to do.

And what does our low dollar mean for the inflation that Mr Rudd and the Reserve Bank Governor were allegedly addressing?

It's pretty grubby stuff.

COMMENTS

Saturday, 11 October 2008

What a dreadful article. Not only for its failure to comprehend the most basic economics, but for its constant sly innuendo. Firstly, the game is no longer about inflation, it is about confidence. Fear has replaced greed as the market sentiment. Secondly, the call for a "stewards enquiry". If the author has evidence of any form of wrong doing, let him present it, he certainly has the forum to do so. In the goold old Aussie vernacular, put up or shut up.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

Saturday, 11 October 2008

Mick S, although I agree that A. Jones has a habit of pointing the finger, it would take a blind Monkey (Sorry Andrew Symonds) not to see the collusion between the reserve bank, the government and the big four banks. So to a degree, putting up is easy, it is right before your eyes, the big banks cry poor, but post record profits. Rudd can't have it both ways, he gets in on 10 rate rises and has more with him at the helm and then takes credit for the reduction as a result of meltdown. Go figure

Posted by: T G, Holsworthy

Saturday, 11 October 2008

T G, what I actually saw was the Reserve Bank acting to protect our banks, and our economy. Have you not noticed that banks have collapsed overseas? Have you not noticed the share market collapse, and the lack of confidence? I am not claiming that Rudd should get any credit for an interest rate cust, I am claiming that the RBA had little choice. Notice also that many countries followed suit with rate cuts. If A.Jones has evidence of any wrongdoing, let him produce it.

Posted by: Mick S, central Coast

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Mick S.I think that Glenn Stevens can justifiably be charged with incompetence, He was too trigger happy raising interest rates. He came out making mighty statements about not hesitating to raise interest rates in an election year-it could have been politically motivated-when really the signs were pointing to the fact that there should not be any more rises at that time. The US sub prime problems were known and the domestic inflation rates were being driven by the jump in oil prices, mortgages .rents, and food prices. The interest rate increases could not stop people from spending on the essential items and indeed actually contributed to higher mortgages and rents.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Saturday, 11 October 2008

I don't blame Stevens for this. I blame Rudd for his mishandling.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

Saturday, 11 October 2008

Unfortunately, the typical baiting ludicrous comment we have come to expect from this poster. No point asking for any form of logical argument.

Posted by: Mick S, central Coast

Saturday, 11 October 2008

A biased and ridiculous comment on a biased and ridiculous story. Alan Jones quoting Glenn Milne and then concluding that Milne's outrageously biased assertions diposed of the issue of the RBA governor's independence. I am amazed that Jones even has time to make this garbage up when he is so busy selling credit cards on his program, not a very responsible activity in this time of credit crisis.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Saturday, 11 October 2008

What a joke, when rate were plunging wordwide, these clowns were raising ours. Domestic demand is but one factor driving inflation.

Posted by: Michael Adendorff, Coffs Harbour

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Stevens was actually appointed as governor of the RBA by Peter Costello in 2006 for a term of 7 years. Rudd change that term to Governor for life very soon after he was sworn in as PM. Considering the impact of the interest rate increases on the 2007 election, increases that went against prevailing economic wisdom, I am at best deeply suspicious. I am certainly convinced Stevens is incompetent.

Posted by: A Narchy, The Hills

 

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Harris you are as ignorant as many of your LIberal mates.All of the RBA board were appointed by Howard so pretty safe to say political bias is ridiculous.As Jones knows Stevens only has one vote at all meetings so he can be outvoted on decisions.This makes Jones rantings even more dishonest.Jones article is full of hypocracy highlighted by the fact he thinks the RBA could defend the currency against a world sell off.The subsequent cut in interest rates o/seas shows the RBA right on the money.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Lance you are a complete basket case. If all RBA board members are appointed by Howard and they were pro liberal why did they raise interest rate in election month last Nov? LOL.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Sunday, 12 October 2008

W O, I think if you re-read the comments Lance actually comments "political bias is ridiculous". The RBA has always appeared to run their own race, and so they should. One does note that a certain Mr. Jones is quite capable of writing these outrageously provocative comments, but never later appears to defend or explain his position. Must be hard to see the little people from the lofty heights of "Struggle Street".

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Lance Freestone-You are a Goose, an absolute Goose. When a person is appointed to a Board of a public utility it does not automatically follow that they have political leanings towards the Government that appointed them-they are supposed to be independent-remember stupid? Independence does not equate to zero political bias. Governor Stevens is a career Public Servant as is his deputy Ric Battelino and the Secretary Ken Henry has always been attacking the Coalition. Their leadership is bound to influence the Board Members. You have failed to address the substance of my comments-why did he push up interest rates so vigorously when the economic dark clouds were gathering.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Sunday, 12 October 2008

put your teeth back in wo... he said "political bias is ridiculous" because they were appointed under Howard (not that they were biased TOWARDS Howard)... and they raised interest rates in November because, as your little mate Johnny LOVED telling us..... "The RBA is independant of the government" haha... sound familiar??? because it REALLY should...

Posted by: happy unionist, dapto

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Um, let's see, maybe because of the prevailing economic indicators at the time, and the fact they have to act within their remit to adjust interest rates in response to those indicators and not the political process? One of the best moves ever made in this country was to establish an independent Reserve. It exposes Howard (who tried to make out he had his hand on the levers), Jones (who just has sour grapes that Johnny got shafted) and Des (see prior comments in parenthisis) as blowhards.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Jones comments that importers on struggle street are being hurt by currency drop is a joke.What about farmers and exporters of local products who will benefit from higher prices.Jones dishonestly fails to mention that he must support o/s workers producing imported products that have flooded the market whilst the dollar was high.Poor COLES & W/W will now have to pay more or source local product that now may be cheaper.There are always winners and losers when the $ moves Jones should say so.

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

 

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Wipeout you just dont get it.Go to the RBA website and check for yourself who appointed the current board.If you are suggesting Howard appointed pro Labor members you are delusional.The fact of the matter is the RBA has done an excellent job over the last 20 yrs regardless of the composition of the board.Perhaps the RBA raised rates in Nov because it truly is an independent body .

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

Monday, 13 October 2008

Lance Freestone, - Pay attention to my message. 1) Governments appoint Board members-they cannot order them to have a political preference. By your argument John Kerr should not have sacked Gough-because Gough appointed him.2) The Governor and the Deputy Governor of the RBA are academics- and academics usually favor Labor-and the Secretary has invariably been hostile to the Coalition.3) If the RBA has done such a fantastic job in the last 20 years how come they had interest rates so high in 1990 and again up to early 2008 that they had to bring them down in panic mode?. If they were that good they would have been planning ahead. The retailers have condemned the RBA for raising rates up until March this year when consumer confidence was taking a nose dive.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Monday, 13 October 2008

After talking to alot of people a regional currency instead of the Australian dollar will help the wealth problem. We are still suffering from high inflation and high interest rates. no more RBA.

Posted by: Avea Avea, Melbourne

 

Monday, 13 October 2008

Thank you Mick S for pointing out the obvious to these drongos.Clearly the RBA is indepedent and raised rates in Nov 07 because inflation was facing upward pressure.Get with with the script Harris I said Howard appointed the board.Now you want to suggest blokes like Roger Corbett are gunna get run over by public servants.Of course the retailers condemn rate rises but obviously the business members of the RBA board must have agreed or the increase would have been defeated.You are an idiot Harris

Posted by: Lance Freestone,

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
Register to receive daily news and sports details