Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Wednesday, 03 December 2008

We need urgent action on Woolies rort

29/02/2008 8:37:00 AM.  | Alan Jones

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

There is still, in spite of all the talk from Canberra, no discernible understanding of the extent to which what I call the Woolworths factor is contributing to inflation and damaging consumers.

In relation to Malcolm, whose livelihood's been destroyed at Mittagong by Woolworths, I'm grateful for some high profile legal people who've now come to his aid.

And Woolworths will find themselves answering in another place.

It will not be pretty.

But we've had the Woolworths figures this week, half yearly profits heading towards a billion dollars.

Adam Smith, in the Wealth of Nations, the bible of capitalism, wrote: "The rate of profit is always highest in countries which are going fastest to ruin".

And Woolworths will keep telling us that the drought is the villain in relation to increasing prices, or that Woolworths are trying to hold back the tide of rising food costs.

You come to the conclusion that whoever is writing this stuff is a pathological liar engaged in one of the longest running and most effective disinformation campaigns in Australia's history.

Since 2005 Woolworths have increased their gross margin from 24.51 per cent to 25.56 per cent. That is, increasing the mark-up on what they sell.

And that represents an extra $400 million annually they've ripped out of consumers' pockets. This is a wealth transfer from the pockets of Australian families into the pockets of Woolworths. And they blame the drought, when the farmer has got not one cent more. And then they claim they're lowering prices or swallowing price increases.

This is rank deceptive conduct, in breach of section 52 of the Trade Practices Act. But no one in Government can yet pull their heads out of the sand.

Competition is meant to harm competitors.

But Woolworths enjoyed such a huge surge in margins that it shows that competition has collapsed. Woolworths and Coles have got 80 per cent of the market.

It's not competition.

And if they've got 80 per cent of the market, what supplier can get justice from Woolworths.

Indeed, think about this.

There's most probably three billion dollars worth of goods on supermarket shelves. Not one cent has been paid for.

They exploit their market power by screwing the supplier and withholding payment. And what supplier can afford to say no to any demand that Woolworths makes?

Last year Woolworths had an incredible $750 million in negative stock, that's cash for goods they'd sold and instead of paying the suppliers it's sitting there earning bank interest.

And in the last six months that negative stock has gone to over 1.3 billion.

So in the last six months Woolworths have delayed paying their suppliers by a further $574 million.

Sitting on a cash pile of $1.3 billion that they've received from customers, withholding from paying their suppliers.

And if they pick up about 7 per cent annually in interest they've got another $100 million because they can use their market power to demand extended payment terms.

And as Woolworths increase gross profits, up go retail prices, up goes inflation, the Reserve Bank increases interest rates.

But when the interest rates increase, Woolworths get an even higher return on the 1.3 billion cash they're withholding from suppliers.

When is this absolute farce going to end?

A new Government, new ideas, or just more inquiries and more of the same.

We'll keep at it.

I wish the Government would start getting into it.

COMMENTS

Friday, 29 February 2008

Brilliant, factual 7 relevant, Alan. Well done. But tragically, we can see by the lack of commentary in "Your Say" that nobody really cares about one of the root, real causes of inflation. Sad, but just watch the political bickering continue on this blog, watch Rudd & his cohorts form committees, and watch inept opposition all of them calmly sit back and put self interest first.

Posted by: Bob Partington, Wahroonga

Friday, 29 February 2008

Bob, well said. And to Alan, another outstanding piece of factual analysis. Sadly so far the only thing the Rudd gove can suggest (and they boast giving us "fresh ideas" and "new leadership") in this issue is ask customers to check their shopping dockets! Come on, Rudd - the "working families" are really waiting for the bacon (literally!).

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Friday, 29 February 2008

I agree Bob. Mr.Jones you are right on the money! Throw in the monopolies of shopping centre conglomerates and small business just doesn't have a chance.

Posted by: Ron Stuart, Brisbane

 

Friday, 29 February 2008

Lest we forget this happened under the watchful eye of Mr John Howard.I thought he was the so called champion of Small Business?He allowed Woollies and Coles to destroy small Business so his creditability is well and truly shot.Can't see how Liberal supporters can defend their Champion on this issue so we will probably not here from them.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Friday, 29 February 2008

In preference to dwelling in the past Dapto, precisely what will your man Kev be doing about this? Will he form ANOTHER committee? Will he have experts scrutinise the "shopping dockets"?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 29 February 2008

Mr Keating, forget about Howard. He's gone! Blaming him won't solve anything. Try talking to your friend Rudd instead! He promised that he will look into the grocery pricing but so far nothing has been done!

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Friday, 29 February 2008

Howard has gone but not forgotten.I like Pauls words "Lest we forget" Rudd might be able to fix this but it is rotten to the core!Don't like his chances, been let go to long.Small business is going the same way as the dinosaursVery,Very Very SAD.!

Posted by: Gazza Rowe, Brisbane

Sunday, 02 March 2008

PK and GH; the election erection is over, krudd has to now stand on his own 2 feet and make his own policies since JH is no longer there to give him policies to take credit for. As far as your persistant rabbiting on about your make believe failings of JH; my suggestion to you is simple just like you. I will write it slowly because you are both very slow learners. Go to your local hardware store, buy some timber, build a bridge and get over it.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

 

Friday, 29 February 2008

This is a typically inane commentary, peppered with sensationalist allegory and intended to generate poorly informed hysteria.

Posted by: Craig Hackett, Brisbane

Friday, 29 February 2008

Craig, how can something so full of ideas and facts be "inane". Do you support Woolworths? How can YOU justify their actions? Please explain? Or do you just dislike Alan Jones?

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Friday, 29 February 2008

Hackett, which aspects of Alan's piece do you disagree with?

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

 

Friday, 29 February 2008

At the end of the day it is a private company that sets its own prices with the view of making a profit. If people are so against Woolies as a company for maximising its profit, don't shop there. Ranting and raving calling them liars because they make reference to the drought when talking about pricing isn’t an offence. Let’s also remember there is/was a drought. Also if the suppliers are not getting payed, as indicated, it is up to suppliers to take the necessary legal action for a breach of contract. And if it is so wide spread, which is the inference, I would have thought there would have been a class action against Woolies by now. They are not a charity organisation, they are a company wanting to make a profit, and they seem to be doing that very well. I wish I had shares in Woolworths.

Posted by: Phil A, Central Coast

 

Friday, 29 February 2008

There needs to be legislation. One, set a limit of no more than one outlet every 200 miles in the country, and every 15 miles in cities. Two, Increase the tax rate after a company gets to say 50 outlets across Australia so that it becomes uneconomic to expand beyond say 100 outlets. Three include in that all the banners owned by that company. Where a Director is on the board of two companies that means for tax purposes they are assessed as one company. Increase company tax.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Saturday, 01 March 2008

....and Hendo calls himself a "capitalist". Idiot.

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

Saturday, 01 March 2008

Ok Bensen, prove your point if you're going to abuse me. How is opposing Monopolies and dualopolies and cartels indicative of not being a capitalist? Woolworths is not a capitalist venture anymore. It's lazy donothingfortheirprofit shareholders ripping off the public and wiping out small business. Not a capitalist in sight, unless it's the small business people they are destroying. Prove your point or apologise.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Sunday, 02 March 2008

Oh Hendo, I am soooooo sorry, entry should have read ....and Hendo calls himself a "capitalist idiot", the punctuation was all wrong!

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

 

Saturday, 01 March 2008

Liberals should have stepped up to Woolworths, and I believe P Costello was introducing legislation to do so, but that was scrapped with the election loss (I think). While you’re asking why John Howard hasn’t done anything, there were SOME things which could have been done by the state LABOR gov. Its not only predatory pricing going on here (which is federal responsibility) But since we're on predatory pricing, Ask KRudd why isn’t this on his agenda since this contributes to inflation.

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

Saturday, 01 March 2008

Forgive me for answering my own question about why didn’t state LABOR do anything to help small business, In the last few weeks we have been witnessing some indigestible deals with councils and state gov, perhaps there may be a conflict with big business including Woolies with councils and state gov? Hmm could this be why nothing was done by state gov in regards to predatory pricing and land lord thuggery? Watch this space. Just thinking out loud.

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

Saturday, 01 March 2008

Bart, Don't you know anything that you didn't hear from some other Liberal fool? That is not thinking, I have yet to see any evidence of you actually thinking, that is Parroting, could be called blithering, it could also be called verbal wa#%!ng. Seriosly, I would think you were a primary school kid if your views were not so old fashioned and out dated.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Monday, 03 March 2008

Reality hurts ay Hendo?

Posted by: Bart R, Sydney

 

Saturday, 01 March 2008

I wonder if everyone who posted comments here have invested money in share markets, maybe it is the share market has gone too, looked at oil companies or retail companies, they all said they are looking at share holders interests not comsumers interests. If they have those mind set, I don't see prices will go down.

Posted by: sam zhao, epping

 

Saturday, 01 March 2008

I’m sick of this "Woolworths Factor" bull you go on about. For sure the retail sector of the Australian economy is concentrated, but you can't honestly blame Woolworths or Coles. Wouldn't it be negligent of Woolies to invest over 300,000 Australians hard earned cash in anything less than the best they can achieve. Inflation rates worldwide are skyrocketing, so who can we blame for this? Perhaps Walmart or perhaps the fact that there is a lot more competition for the food we eat! Move on already!

Posted by: D B, Brisbane

 

Sunday, 02 March 2008

People forget that companies are nothing more than money making machines. They are not people, have no feelings and so implying that they must act with "concience" is stupid. Big companies must be regulated, that's why we have bodies like the ACCC. However, it's worth remembering, that these "money making machines" work with ruthless efficiency and, at the end of the day, deliver the product or service at the lowest cost to the consumer. Our vegi's were not relatively cheaper 20 years ago.

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

Sunday, 02 March 2008

Exactly. Would the public prefer them to be more inefficient and have less of a capability to reduce prices? Not to mention this Machine employs more that 180,000 Australians. What does Allan say to these people, who work hard for a company that a lot of them beleive in?

Posted by: Dylan A, Brisbane

 

Sunday, 02 March 2008

We have shares in Woolworths but I am still horrified...

Posted by: Amanda Gorham, Brisbane

Sunday, 02 March 2008

What are you horrified about?

Posted by: Adam Walsh, Brisbane

 

Sunday, 02 March 2008

Geoff Bolton, it is interesting that you mentioned shopper dockets; the people who use these to claim their 4 c/l are the real bunnies in this equation. People are making sure they spend over $30 per trip to get their discount voucher so they can save $2.40 on a 60 litre tank of fuel. Their grocery bill has gone up over $20 to compensate for this $2.40 discount.This is where the investigation should take place; this is blatent profiteering and misleading advertising aimed at the poor & gullable.

Posted by: James H, United Socialist States of Australia

 

Monday, 03 March 2008

Alan, I am ashamed that you lambaste Woolworths who operate in such a competitive market with significant competition from Coles,Franklins,Bi-lo,IGA & other sma;;er organisations. If Woolworths were such a bad organisation who were so expensive why would the majority of people shop there if they could buy elsewhere for less.The realtive situation is that Woolworths offer value for money & that is why the public finds it convenient to shop there.

Posted by: murray leslie, yamba

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field