Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 11 October 2008

Howard takes a swipe at Rudd

9/07/2008 10:25:00 AM.  | 
Former Prime Minister John Howard has taken a swipe at his successor Kevin Rudd, eight months after Mr Rudd led Labor to victory for the first time in more than a decade.

Mr Howard, who has kept a low profile since losing government and his own seat in last November's federal election, has told a Liberal party dinner in Perth that he did not think Mr Rudd had what it took to lead the country.

"You sometimes get the impression that my successor is more interested in the process of government than the opportunity of leadership that government provides," Mr Howard said.

He said the dishonest and pathetic attempt by Mr Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan to show Australians they'd inherited an economic mess, with high inflation and runaway spending, demonstrates Labor has no shame.

Mr Howard also bought into the debate on climate change and said it was correct for the coalition to be cautious over the proposed emissions trading scheme.

"They (coalition) are right to ask of the present government that it not adopt policies that by going too far ahead will place this nation's great export industries at a competitive disadvantage around the world."

Mr Rudd, who is in Japan on his fourth overseas trip since becoming prime minister, had enjoyed record popularity in the opinion polls, but that has dipped recently.

Mr Howard, who was prime minister for 12 years, told the Perth dinner that the swing against Labor at the recent Gippsland by-election in Victoria showed the gloss had worn off the government.

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

He's like the rest of the Libs bad tempered, Howard I thought we saw the end of you.. Let me tell you Little jonny our KEVIN Australia's PM is doing just fine, he has managed to catch up with most of the worlds leaders and is liked by all folk other than disgruntled libs..

Posted by: G maybury, sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

g maybury, what illegal drug are you taking? Rudd is doing fine?? you've got to be kidding so far he's broken every election promise he made, he's wasting billions on climate change while the idiots who voted for him are ending up on the streets because the roof over their heads costs to much, and it's getting worse , i'd rather have howard back at least he wasn't as blind to all this

Posted by: chris slaveking, democratic crusaders alliance

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

They talked up the problem of inflation so much the RBA decided to do something drastic because they wouldn't (and soon we will be reliving the days of 19% rates), They have broken most of their campaign promises, signed the Kyoto Protocol despite the fact that 1. we already met the requirements 2. no point in signing if the big guys won't so we just wasted money on a piece of paper, no eduction revolution, no better hospitals & need I go on? If that's fine then I wonder what not doing fine is?

Posted by: Alan K, Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

G maybury-You my friend are living in Ga Ga land. Why shouldn’t John Howard defend himself from the bunch of lies that Rudd and his incompetent mates are spewing out every day. They have hardly answered a single question in Parliament without attacking the former Government. Do you complain when the likes of Whitlam, Hawke and Keating have something to say-and they were all failures like Rudd but John Howard was a success? World leaders are probably having a laugh at Rudd with his grandiose proposals for Nuclear disarmament, Pan Pacific unity and carbon emissions policies. They only put up with him out of politeness .He is out of his depth.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

G.Maybury, its not called catching up, its called running away. when all is going pear shaped here, this is where he should be. Oh Henderson will have some diatribe about why he should be else where but the fact is home is in need of direction. Perhaps hes' just checking to see if Howard forgot to sew up at least one trading partner, so he can come home and gloat? Personally my family is suffering iunder RUDD, Dont give me rubbish about inheritance either cause for 8 months hes been running away

Posted by: Nick again, Maryborough

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

I am sure that had Mr Howard won that election then inflation would not be at the height it is now. Rudd and Swan have talked down the Australian economy, given money away to multinational corporations, denied aid and refused comfort. The ALP have bungled indigenous intervention and replaced help with an apology. They have promoted a climate scare campaign and offered no answers beyond economic vandalism. Mr Howard is right on all counts.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

What does it take for Howard, the Biggest Loser 2007 to get the message, he can keep telling his lies, but the vast majority of people now know he is o petty little liar.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

How dare Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs, make such comments about one of the longest running and most popular leaders. He is comparing insainly John Howard to Adolf Hitler. Kevin Rudd DOES NOT have what it takes to be a good leader. What is wrong with John Howard you maniac?

Posted by: Jarrod Glover, Cromer

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Jarrod, he will go down in history as being the second Prime Minister to lose his seat at an election. He will be remembered for this more than what he did for our country.

Posted by: David ., NSW

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Oh dear, the censors have been in. Jarred, Weapons of Mass Destruction. The (Final) (Pacific) Solution. The Concentration Camps.Alvarez, Rau, Kids Overboard, Tampa, Never Ever have a GST. There are plenty of reasons to liken Howard to the Despotic Leader of the Third Reich. His anti-Asian comments also come to mind. I guess the moderator today is one of his followers though.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Is he still alive? Didnt his own electorate vote him out for being an appauling PM? Oh the shame of it all.

Posted by: Rob Byrne, Springwood

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

The people of Bennelong didn't vote John Howard out - the hordes of overseas Macquarie uni students trucked into the area, and a media campaign fit to rival Barak Obama's ensured that the couple of thousand votes that threw Maxine McKew over the line came from very, very newly enrolled voters and deluded greenies, whose preferences went her way.

Posted by: Happy Little Gumnut, Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Happy Little Gumnut-You forgot to mention the Mandarin connection. One shudders to think what Labor would have said to the sizeable Asian population concerning John Winston.

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Well done Mr Henderson you've done it again.You are so blinded by your labor ideology that you once again fail to see what Mr Howard did in those 12 years, not 9 years, not 6 years, not even 3 years of non Labor rule in fact Mr Howard was so bad that Australians kept voting him in again and again and again so unless you are blinded by your ideology he must have done something that was worthy of the honour of being Prime Minister.If you take your head out of your arse you will see the sun shining

Posted by: Chris ., Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Chris nobody, Howard's electoral success can be summed up simply: You can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Howard was clever, he was tricky, but in the ended his dishonesty and nastiness became too obvious to too many people. But of course you can fool some of the people all of the time, them die hard Lib-Nat voters are certainly in that group.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Of course Howard did nothing, he didn't pay back billions of dollars of loans that the Labor government left him with, he didn't improve our economy and oh wait yes he did. Howard despite what you think did incredibly well the only reason Labor got in was because of preferences, if you noticed in the election Labor only got enough votes for certain seats because of the Green's preferences. That and Rudd said he would stop passing the buck which never happened.

Posted by: Sam L, Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Mr Keating It isn't about supporting Mr Howard or supporting the Liberal party it is purely about reality. Mr Howard was kept in government only because he was doing a good job. Go back to 1983 when Mr Hawk was in power and he was in government for along time as well. Isn't it only reasonable that you might say that he was doing a good job as well. It is a two-way street whether you are Labor or Liberal .The proof is in the pudding and Mr Rudd is doing a crap job live with it,we have to.

Posted by: Chris ., Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Chris, mate if Henderson pulled his head out of his arse all he'll see is the quivering Guts of KRUDD! Maybe this tool cant see the reality of Rudd. 4 trips overseas in 4 mnths. The Olympics yet to come so hell be gone again. Whos runningthe ship? Gil;lard the one with the balls he hasnt got. look at this PM, his habit of rubbing his hands together , looking around constantly to see if someone is watching, waving at no one? No confidence and looks out of his depth.

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Just mention the word Howard and Out come his army of Fanatical supporters who will fight to the death to protect J W Howard.He has had his time and should keep his promise of keeping out of Politics OR is that another Promise and LIE that he will BREAK?

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Paul, since when making remarks about the current PM can be regarded as "involving in politics"? We are all making comments about our current incompetent PM here so does this mean we are all involved in politics? Perhaps this poor logic of yours is another pathetic attempt to again distract us from focusing on the inability of your hero to run the country and the economy?

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

WO. J Howard on many occasions stated that past Prime Ministers (Fraser,Hawke etc) Should keep out of Politics once they have Retired.He said he wouldn't do the same.So my logic is he should keep out of commenting! Also you and I and many others never said we would stop commenting!I just don't like people who say they are not going to do something and then they do it.Can't be trusted!

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Paul, my question to you still stands - does "staying out of politics" means "stopping commenting about the current PM altogether"? If so does this mean we are all involved in politics simply by the fact that we are all commenting on our current incompetent PM? Howard does NOT say he will stop commenting about the current PM and neither do we.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Howard said last year: "interest rates will always be higher under labor", "there are tough times ahead so we don't need new leadership, we need right leadership". In hindsight these prophetic words can't be more correct. Unfortunately most Australians ignored these warnings & voted for rhetorics & spins. With rising living costs, higher interest rate & unemployment, working families got sucked in & got what they deserved-things will only get tougher as Rudd has no idea how to run the country.

Posted by: W O, Turramurra

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Chris, there is one promise that they haven't broken. Garrett said they'd change it all when they got in. Truer words haven't been spoken since.

Posted by: Ashley Glenday, North Richmond

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Mr. Howard has every right to be annoyed at the false criticism that his outgoing Government is receiving from Rudd and his Party. Instead of getting hysterical people should calmly and honestly look at the facts. The incoming Howard Government inherited a $96 billion debt -the average home mortgage under Labor was 12.75% the Coalition reduced that to 7.2%.Real wage growth under Labor was minus 1.8% under the Coalition it was 19.8%.Unemployment was 8.2% the Coalition reduced that to 4.2%.The average inflation under Labor was 5.2% and under the Coalition just 2.5%.The Coalition also reduced the overall Tax burden. Of course Rudd and Labor try to dismiss the Howard Governments success saying that it only happened because of the resources boom. This is nonsense because the Coalition began improving the economy long before the resources boom began. It is also nonsense because we still have the resources boom-stronger than ever and yet our economy is starting to struggle and business and co

Posted by: Desmond Harris, Beacon Hill

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

One day in the very near future when all of us acknowledge what a shamster Kevin really turned out to be we will join together to relive the glory days that were John Howards and thank God that we lived at that particular time in history.

Posted by: John Arthur Daley, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Paul Keating, that's not fair, when John Winston Howard THe Biggest Loser 2007 said that he wouldn't interfere in Politics once he left office, HE WAS MAKING A NON-CORE PROMISE, Johnny's mum told him he could tell lies if he crossed his fingers when he did it. These people who can be fooled all the time are not interested in the truth, they are allowed to lie because they were born to be rulers. The good thing is that no-one can damage the Libs like Howard can, he reminds people why they voted.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

I hope you don't mind me asking but you seem to comment on a lot of political news stories speaking against the liberals yet I have never actually seen you say WHY you hate them or WHY labor is better? Now you don't have to I was just interested, everyone else on this article said why they thought J Howard was better.

Posted by: Katy Dale, North Sydney

Wednesday, 09 July 2008

Lets see, Deporting Ms Alverez after her road accident, because she looked Asian. Ms Rau being imprisoned. The concentration Camps. Putting the spanner in the Kyoto Protocol works. Lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction. Lying about the GST. Lying about Kids overboard. Mistreating the Tampa survivors. Crawling up George Bush's backside. Invading Iraq while bribing Saddam. Slave choices legislation. Failing to save the Murray River. Promoting Nuclear Power. Wasting money on advertising for polit

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

Thursday, 10 July 2008

If by concentration camp you mean the detention centres well obviously you have only listened to the news. I've seen Villawood and they live better than I do, soccer fields, basketball court, tended gardens, hd tvs in every room and a pool. I would hardly relate that to being killed at a concentration camp. Work Choices was actually good just people were scared from Rudd's campaign, it helped small businesses especially. You seem to just like throwing around buzzwords to make things sound worse.

Posted by: Alan K, Sydney

Thursday, 10 July 2008

If I was Jewish I would be very insulted by that, you can not compare detention centres and concetration camps together. Have you ever been to one or do you only listen to the headlines? They live better than I do at Villawood. Soccer field, basketball court, tended gardens, hd tvs seriously what else do they want? We don't kill them and they have come here illegally. I find your choice of comparing Howard to Hitler irresponsible and insulting. Work choices were good for small businesses.

Posted by: Alan K, Sydney

Thursday, 10 July 2008

I live and work near Villawood. The detention centre is a good place that I would be happy to live in. I lost relatives to the Nazis in hell holes I would not go near. I wonder why the left seem to love truly appalling people, like Mugabe, and denigrate decent, hard working high achievers, like Mr Howard? Is it, after all, only for reasons of politics?

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

Thursday, 10 July 2008

I just had a family member in there helping to rebuild it, so Villawood isn't a bad place at all I wish I had half the stuff they did. Yes he lied about the GST but ask any accountant it simplified the Tax system so I don't see it as bad. Work choices was good for business and employees. Yes some took advantage but you get those no matter what. It allowed business to get rid of the bad seeds, it helped my family's business alot. No Slaves Here

Posted by: Sam L, Sydney

Thursday, 10 July 2008

Villawood? What about Christmas Island, Baxter and Nauru? So you mongrels will swap freedom for a HD TV, don't make me laugh, and given that these people have as a rule committed no great crime, comfort is small compensation for incarceration. Howard and his supporters are like the Nazis and their supporters, they couldn't get away with the absolute horror the Nazis committed, but if they could have, they would have. The main thing is to keep Howard's memory alive, so we don't ever forget.

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Thursday, 10 July 2008

It is going to take more than 8 months for Mr Rudd to get things moving, give him a chance.

Posted by: David Wilson, Parklea

Thursday, 10 July 2008

Rudd hasn't stopped moving since he got the PM's jet. (The working class can kiss his arse he's got the PM's job at last).

Posted by: Thomas Gunn, Canberra

Thursday, 10 July 2008

to: david wilson, he's already got things moving in the 8 months he's been in power, they're just moving backwards

Posted by: alan t, bankstown

 

Thursday, 10 July 2008

after getting the BIG lemodae & sars the monkey faced former PM should just keep is opinions to himself - the tribe has spoken!