Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Saturday, 30 August 2008

Happy Australians shoot Muslims, research finds

16/07/2008 10:26:00 PM.  | Anil Lambert-Patel

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

When faced with an apparent threat from a man in a Muslim-style turban, Australians are likely to shoot first and ask questions later – especially if they’re in a good mood.

Researchers at the University of New South Wales have found most Australians see a turban as a threat – even if they’re not aware they hold that prejudice.

During the study Australian university students played a computer games which involved shooting people who appeared on apartment balconies.

Some of the characters in the game were wearing turbans or hijabs – while others were bareheaded.

Players were instructed to shoot the characters carrying guns and spare the unarmed.

Researchers found Muslim-looking characters – men and women – were more likely to be shot, even if they were carrying an innocent looking item like a mug or drink bottle.

The study found angry players shot more at everyone, but happy players particularly targeted the Muslim-looking characters.

Dr Tom Denson, who headed the study, said that mood played a big part in the results.

"We manipulated mood in the study," he told LIVENEWS.com.au.

"We had a neutral control condition. We had an anger condition in which people received some feedback that made them a little bit angry and then we had a happiness condition in which people received some feedback that made them feel good.

"What happens is - and this is part of a broader set of findings - happy people tend to rely on stereotypes a little bit more than unhappy people."

The study found that men were more likely to be shot than women with the bias to shoot strongest on Muslim-dressed, non-Caucasian males. The characters left unharmed most often were non-Muslim, Caucasian females.

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

I would be more inclined to take aim at 'Conservatives, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Scientologist's and the Elusive Brethren and the Freemason's' before I would consider taking aim at Muslims or the Islamic faith.

Posted by: Sean Ambrose, Helensburgh

 

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

I think the headline link to the article is a big stretch. I wouldn't shoot anyone.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

What a crock!!Did the gov. pay money for this research? Dr Denson, I ask you this.In your research did it ever come to light WE DONT HAVE GUNS!! Our Bloody Guv stole them from us and said we were too irresponsible to own such things? What are we shooting them with? Rubber bands and paperclips?? Morons!!

Posted by: Nick again, Maryborough

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

Nick again, you goon. Did you think that maybe this study wasn't specifically to see how likely Australians were to shoot Muslims? That maybe it was trying to find more general trigger prejudices? It never fails to amaze me the arrogance of people like you that think they alone have seen something incredibly obvious that everyone else has missed. Fair dinkum.

Posted by: One step Beyond, Sydney

Thursday, 17 July 2008

So ONE STEP Beyond, When told your more likely to shoot someone from one background to another, your saying we wouldnt shoot anyone. Its all just an exerxcise to see if we suffer predjudice or Racism. Realy.Are you so bereft of self triggering mechanisms within your own head you need a study done to make you aware of your shortcomings? I suggest to you the Study is faulty as the use of a computer game is somewhat different to picking up a weapon to Shoot someone. Then again???

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

If anyone is interested harvard university has been looking at implicit bias for many years now and there are a serious of tests you can do online that will test your own bias on religion, race, gender and a variety of other areas...its quiet interesting. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

This is a silly study on two levels. 1st - What does it achieve? Answer: Nothing really. Other than try and stir up emotional issues. 2nd - What do you expect after years of media forcing the Muslim --> Terror threat down everyones throats. Do the same study in the 1980's and you'd come up with Russians. Do the same study in 1970 and prior and it'd be Asians instead. It's simple, People react to the focus of the moment. And for the most part - It's the media that makes or breaks the focus.

Posted by: Mitch OMatic, Sydney

 

Sunday, 20 July 2008

It would be more acurate to say Uni of N.S.W. students are likely to kill people that hold mugs and drink bottles,or uni students are more emotionally unstable then the rest of us.Perhaps uni students play more computer games and are likley to understand that it was just a game.Maybe they shoot people with any kind of hat or headgear on, i dont particularly like people with baseball caps. Maybe Indian sieks and hindus should feel worried. Maybe its the food at the local indian takeaways fault

Posted by: STUART SEE, MARRICKVILLE

 

Friday, 08 August 2008

Aw, now, is there any wonder why American love Australians!!! You guys rule!!!

Posted by: Pithy Opiner, California, USA

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 

YOUR SAY

You then went on about genital mutilation- what does that have to do with Dr Haneef? Then you refer to hearings on Dr Patel, how... Concerned Liberal, Minto on Haneef plans to return to Australia, expects compensation and apology

Until our Govts, in their High wisdom, wake up and make Defensive driving tests mandatory, this sort of thing will continue to happen. My condolances... Nick Again, maryborough on Three teenagers killed in Perth crash

CL, seeing that you want to respond to directly to MY post, as does Lance Hendo, and thank you for answering my query. I am... susan lawe, gippsland on Haneef plans to return to Australia, expects compensation and apology

To the Cambridge Park Lark - You still don't get it do you? - Why should the Australian Taxpayer pay this person compensation? - innocent... Dan Concerned, * on Haneef plans to return to Australia, expects compensation and apology

No, they all should converse with only your TWO persona's Lance henderson. 2 persona's with an identical view, and not enough manners to understand this... susan lawe, gippsland on Haneef plans to return to Australia, expects compensation and apology