Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Thursday, 04 December 2008

PM to tackle body image

5/10/2008 4:30:00 PM.  | AAP
Skinny models dominating catwalks and magazines will become a thing of the past if a federal government plan to reform the fashion world succeeds.

The Rudd government is considering introducing a code of conduct to rein in the worst excesses of the fashion, media and advertising industries in an attempt to reduce the number of teenagers suffering eating disorders.

It would require magazines and advertisers to use fewer skinny models and instead feature a mix of body shapes and sizes.

Images that are digitally altered will need to be clearly labelled as such.

Youth Minister Kate Ellis says surveys consistently show body image is "one of the greatest concerns" among young Australians.

She says the average age of people suffering from eating disorders is getting "lower and lower".

"We've got reports from hospitals of children as young as six being admitted with anorexia," Ms Ellis told Sky News.

"It's pretty clear there is a substantial issue out there.

"It is a complex issue but it's one the government must address."

The federal government is investigating a code of conduct along the lines of Victoria's voluntary media code introduced in April.

"The code of conduct is one possible solution," the youth minister said.

"We'll be investigating and exploring it further.

"It works with a range of different stakeholders - the media, the advertising industry and the fashion industry."

Victoria's code is voluntary but Ms Ellis won't say whether federal Labor will take a similar approach.

"That's something we will look at further," she said.

But the youth minister rejected suggestions a voluntary code would be ineffective due to a lack of enforcement measures.

"What we have seen previously from different governments around the world that have explored these options is that it's actually been most effective when it's been a voluntary code," Ms Ellis said.

Governments couldn't solve the "complicated" issue alone, but could make inroads "if we can work in partnership with those other stakeholders", she said.

The government says the federal Office for Youth, formed last month, will make the code of conduct a priority issue.

The office is part of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

COMMENTS

Sunday, 05 October 2008

So what next we will see Miss Piggy on the cat walk?

Posted by: Kermit Frog,

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Maybe not Miss Piggy, but a model that doesn't look like some poor soul just released from Auschwitz. Some of those high fashion models don't look like they're going to make it back up the catwalk.

Posted by: Peter C, Sydney

Monday, 06 October 2008

ugh, no thanks. The last thing I want to see is Therese Rein on the catwalk.

Posted by: Patricia S, Sydney

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Anything,as long as its not Gillard.

Posted by: Vic Seer, Sydney

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Guys, this is really important stuff! Forget the world's financial crisis and struggling pensions.. let's deal with the friggin' catwalk! UNBELIEVABLE ... Rudd and his weapons of mass distraction!

Posted by: Geoff Bolton, Lane Cove

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Gary Bolton , you make me wanna puke with your tunnel visioned Liberal diatribe .The purpose for the the Rudd govenments CONSIDERATION of introducing a code ofconduct within the modelling industry is an attempt at curbing the increasing rate of anorexia and bulimia. These conditions cost the community millions upon millions of dollars in treatment eg hospitalisation , mental health services .Why wouldn't the Rudd government want to intervene ,pity you cant see why

Posted by: slick 6, WA

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Gary Bolton , you make me wanna puke with your tunnel visioned Liberal diatribe .The purpose for the the Rudd govenments CONSIDERATION of introducing a code ofconduct within the modelling industry is an attempt at curbing the increasing rate of anorexia and bulimia. These conditions cost the community millions upon millions of dollars in treatment eg hospitalisation , mental health services .Why wouldn't the Rudd government want to intervene ,pity you cant see why

Posted by: slick 6, WA

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

It's Super-Kev to the rescue to right wrongs, set the world straight and restore balance to the universe - LOL. This guys is simply absurd. Not that I disagree with taking a stance against the fashion industry and their terrible obsession with a sick female body image but this is just NOT something the "nanny state" should be doing. When will these people realise that they are not our daddies, they are just our employees and are there to maintain communal functions of our society. DAH!!!

Posted by: Jo Stalin, Sydney

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Well done Kevin. Your next assignment is to control the newspapers.

Posted by: Bob Rapp, Terrigal

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Well done Kevin. Your next assignment to achieve that is to control the newspapers??

Posted by: Bob Rapp, Terrigal

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Apparently Rudd, considers young womens desire to be thin takes precedence over sick old deviates taking porno photos of little kids.Why not a code of conduct for children. But then does any one take any notice of ethics or any codes of conduct, these days its just a cop out to cover up what really goes on.

Posted by: Alex Uren, Luddenham

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Rudd is back in Australia? Glad to know he found a place where there would be lots of cameras. Maybe if his advice is followed there will be more pictures of him. I note that when it comes to airbrushing Rudd gets the full treatment. Lets see him do without first.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

You'd laugh at this caricature of a Prime Minister if he wasn't so pathetic. He has to have a say about everything, except the things that REALLY matter, but then how the hell would he know WHAT matters. He's never around long enough to know. It's no good pretending you care about us Mr Rudd, ALMOST everyone can see through you. That's because you're so transparent. You make a mockery of the office you hold.

Posted by: colleen a, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

There are things which I consider the PM should be paying more urgent attention to as well Colleen. However, for people with eating disorders it is a matter of life and death, and no doubt it is very important to those people and their families. Just part of living in a democracy I guess. With regards to transparency, I am continually amazed by the small group of die hards who still cannot figure out that Howard was screwing all of us. He robbed the office of dignity with his power-hunger.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Yes this is an important issue but not one the PM should be dealing with. This isn't a federal matter, they can't make a law against it and they really can't do anything. This is something that has to be dealt with by not going to the shows, not buying the clothes the designers would get the idea but this is definitely NOT something the PM should be handling

Posted by: Sam L, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Sam, I agree with your comments about how best to deal with this matter, people should vote with their feet. It is however not correct to say the Fed Govt does not have the power to impose a voluntary (or even a mandatory) code on the publishers and advertisers. Since the WorkChoices decision in the High Court, the Feds have virtually unfettered powers to legislate with respect to corporations in trade and commerce, as that Constituional power has been significantly expanded by that decision.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Sam while I agree with your view people should vote with their feet, women have never been known to do that with the fashion and cosmetics industries.They are ripped off for a jar of moisturiser that the cheaper one is almost identical to, but the most expensive says "anti-wrinkle", and somehow womens brains turn off when reading these false claims.The images pounded into little girls from as young as 4, serve only to create young women with self esteem issues, eating disorders, depression etc

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Cont: and eating disorders in children as young as 6.The fashion industry needs to be held accountable for images such as the one in this article.If all pubescent girls were to attain this weight, none of them would menstruate, as they need 30% body fat in order to begin, and sustain, their cycle.It also leads to liver failure, renal failure, and many end up unable to have children.It is unhealthy to force this down gilrs throats.Soon the health system will have to deal with the side effects

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Susan, I have to disagree with you. Parents are the ultimate points of responsibility. 30% Body fat? My daughter will not see menstration then if that be the case? School grounds do MORE damage than ANY magazine could hope to do in the way of Image battery.Personally I cant see why anyone would want their Garments fashioned by the Stick insect heading this article? Diets for the Top end models like this are mainly Speed/heroin. Nothing Cuts the fat like them.

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Check it out Nick, it is a fact. Many pubescent gymnasts do not menstruate, they do not have the BMI or body fat. Unfortunately you dont seem to link the school yard with this image Nick.I can assure you among girls, image is dominant, and sadly image is dictated to many of these little girls by fashion, tv, mags.Even positive parenting can be defeated by these type images.Unless your daughter doesnt watch tv or read mags Nick, all she see's are these kind of images, from birth to death.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Monday, 06 October 2008

Susan, Please read again WHAT i wrote.In particular, the 5th sentence. Thanks. Now on the 30% fat. My sister NEVER had 30% fat on her body at ANY time of her life..NEVER. Sorry, the article you refer may be an AVERAGE? My daughter would be flat out tagging 20% ? We just arent Built that way I'm afraid. Gymnasts were given hormones Sussan to hold Menstration at bay. No susan My does watch TV and read, however her Viewing of tv is regulated and we talk with Both HER and her friends about Body imag

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

Monday, 06 October 2008

Athletes often do lose their periods (amenorrhea), but this is when the body fat is less than 10%. The average female body fat ranges from 14% to 25% depended on age. The younger you are the lower the body fat percentage. There is no doubt that the fed govt can make laws or "voluntary codes" for this type of thing. The issue is whether they should, & whether it will be effective. As a mum of 3 girls I see how young it starts, I don't think it will work - but there's no harm in trying.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Monday, 06 October 2008

Thanks CL. I was aware of why the Atheletes stop menstrating and the Gymnasts of earlier yrs( not sure if still practices)taking hormones to hold them at bay. All the best with the 3 girls dearie...glad i dont live there..LOL. My daughter and her friends are doing well,so far not to many hang ups about appearences. Strange, it seems most of the Hassles come from the fatter amongst them??? Oh well, guess things do change eh...Schools still suck...pity the kids cant understand its about education

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

Monday, 06 October 2008

Its definately about education - as toddlers I began explaining how everyone was different, some blonde, some brunette, some white, some black, some peoples body parts don't work, others do etc. I initially did it for racial reasons (they're mixed race) & its been easy to translate that to weight. Fat & skinny are banned words, we talk daily about "health", which is good food & exersize. Whilst their friends are falling apart my girls have a great body image & are accepting of all people.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

Monday, 06 October 2008

When one of my daughters was in year 5; her "so called" best friend poked fun at her for being fat; we only found this out because we noticed she stopped eating; she was born a porker; not by overeating or junk food. Fortunately we addressed this issue very early on. No she does not care what anyone says about her figure; she is what she is. The irony is; many years later; she now has a gorgeous figure and her friend is a bit frumpy. Nature kicked in; there were no diets or anything involved.

Posted by: Fair Minded Aussie, Australia

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

From DC " I am continually amazed by the small group of die hards who still cannot figure out that Howard was screwing all of us. He robbed the office of dignity with his power-hunger." and then just below " the Feds have virtually unfettered powers to legislate with respect to corporations in trade and commerce, as that Constituional power has been significantly expanded by that decision." and so with all Rudd wants to take control of, who is the power hungry one!

Posted by: Neville Simms, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

Well Neville, considering WorkChoices was Howard's legislation, and it was his government who defended the challenge by the States successfully in the High Court, expanding the corporations power, it was Howard's power hunger on display on that occasion. I have not yet seen that Rudd proposes to exploit the new power for any specific legislation, but he certainly could.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

Monday, 06 October 2008

Darren,i'm confused how you ended up with workchoice's into this story,please explain

Posted by: Dennis Smith, syd

Monday, 06 October 2008

With pleasure Dennis. I responded to an assertion that the Fed Govt may not have the power to legislate to control the activities of magazine publishers and advertising agencies by discussing the High Court's decision to uphold the WorkChoices legislation as constitutionally valid, thus expanding the corporatiosn power found in the Consitution. This interpretation means Rudd probabaly has the power if he wants to use it. Clear?

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

cont. and sure some people need to be helped but there is also the responsibility one should take for themselves and the more governments take that away the worse society will become for it, and the way things are going Krudd in attempting to be a Jack of all trades whilst master of none will just take our country down to his incompetent level, and example for darren of greatest concern is his noise about having warships able to compete with Indian and Chinese naval forces.

Posted by: Neville Simms, Sydney

Sunday, 05 October 2008

with regard to 'individuals taking responsibility', I am not sure this is a helpful way to view eating disorders. In common with addictions of various types, these involve a failure of rational decision making capacity which is inherent to the disease itself. I am wary of these types of arguments anyway. We may rely upon ourselves to get a car, but surely it is more sensible to rely on the government (transfers from individuals through taxation) to provide the road to drive it on.

Posted by: darren carrow, brisbane

 

Sunday, 05 October 2008

I think Rudd's going to call it "Body Watch?"

Posted by: Gazza Benson, Blacktown

Monday, 06 October 2008

Just hoping it isnt going to be called " Pollie watch".

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

Monday, 06 October 2008

Well may Rudd call it Body Watch; since his deception of the Australian People last year; by his own admission; he himself has out grown his clothes; by 2 sizes no less. Too much airline food and the good life; me thinks. Maybe they need to reduce the size of the Stroganoff servings just for Porky Kev..

Posted by: Fair Minded Aussie, Australia

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

I am sure the multi million dollar fashion industry is going to take notice of our Mr congenial Prime Minister Rudd.Has anyone ever seen a Aussie PM govern a country in such a pathetic way as this man does.You would think a new election was just around the corner,when all you see is Rudd sweet talking mums and holding their babies,or tapping kids on the head in playgrounds.Mr Rudd start running the country the way it should be run,and stop side tracking every major decision.

Posted by: Bill bridge, Tura Beach

Monday, 06 October 2008

Nick, sorry. I understand what your saying about parents, I wasnt disagreeing with you. I was saying in the schoolyard image even dominates good parental teachings. Girls can be far more vicious than boys, and much of the cruelty is centred around body image. Anorexia is a relatively new phenomenen, and with each decade and more exposure it seems to be escalating. CL , you are correct, the body fat % does depend on age and a few other things.25% isnt much, this pic on here,doubt wouuld make 10%

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Monday, 06 October 2008

Good Nick, that is all you can do, talk to them. Fathers especially have a huge influence on how a girl views herself.I wish more would speak with their daughters about positive body image, healthy diet and excercise and regulate what they watch on the box.

Posted by: susan lawe, gippsland

Monday, 06 October 2008

Nick - i forgot to say, your sympathy is appreciated (we need it :-)) Susan - School yard is definately the issue & I completley agree re girls (see my comments above). As for this waif of a creature, I also agree - I also doubt she's 10%

Posted by: Concerned liberal, Minto

 

Monday, 06 October 2008

In all honesty does anyone think that the girl in this picture has a beautiful body - it wants me want to vomit - I'm sure most men prefer women to look like women and even if they are a little bigger they certainly would look a lot better than this!

Posted by: RS ****, Sydney