Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 21 November 2008

Airport security staff to scrutinise genitals

15/10/2008 7:46:00 PM.  | Tim Brunero
Security staff at Melbourne Airport will be able to look at the genitals of passengers under a trial of a new generation of X-ray equipment.

The scanners use a low energy X-ray to reveal any objects, metal or otherwise, under a traveller’s clothing including their body.

For the next six weeks domestic travellers at Melbourne Airport will be able to volunteer to go through the airport’s new “virtual strip search”.

Operators have refused to blur the genitals of those scanned, saying it limits the effectiveness of the equipment.

“It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities,” says Cheryl Johnson, general manager of the Office of Transport Security.

“It is possible to see genitals and breasts while they’re going through the machine, though.

“The security officer that’s looking at it is located away from the screening lane, so there’s no comparison of the person walking through and the image.

“The images are not saved, you literally walk through, the screener hits a button to say clear and the image goes.”

Johnson claims the machine is actually rather tame.

“The faces are automatically blurred and ... it’s only a chalk-style outline, it’s not as invasive as some of the other equipment that we’ve got,” she said.

Further trials will begin at Sydney and Adelaide airports will start next week.

Operators claim the machine will be used as an alternative to a hand frisk with a hand wand if they fail a normal metal detector test.

The machines will have operators of both genders, so woman can be scanned by women and men by men.

Employees will not be able to take camera phones or any other type of photographic equipment into the monitoring room and it is not possible to save images the machine produces.

The machines will be trailed alongside the ‘Rapiscan secure 1000’, a baggage x-ray machine that can find explosives in luggage.

COMMENTS

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Will this thingy-ma-whatsit be able to detect a ceramic knife concealed internally? Oh.. so it's a giant waste of time and money then?

Posted by: vo ice, sydney

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Hey does anyone know where to get this gig? I want the job! Beat's trying before you buy, if you can see all ;-)

Posted by: Traci Fawcett, Melbourne

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

So when the security officers come up to you with a smile and are friendly; you know you have what it takes in the asset department. This is Clark Kent Stuff.

Posted by: Seasoned Traveller, Planet Krypton

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

If the images "can't be saved" then how come we see two here?????!!!! And surely it can be enabled for evidentiary purposes????!

Posted by: Sam Labourne, Melbourne

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

I have no problem with them trialling it on a voluntary basis, but there is no way in hell I will ever step foot in one of them. If it becomes mandatory, I will drive, or go by ship! I find them extremely invasive and offensive! Perhaps that a gender thing...I'd be interested to know how other female/males feel!

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Agree fully, I would not wish to use them. I would never forgive myself for frightening the security staff, LOL.

Posted by: Mick S, Central Coast

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Would you be guilty of carrying a concealed weapon?

Posted by: John Thomas, Sydney

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

I have no problems with it and couldn't care less using it. However, I am a nobody. What about celebrities, politicians, etc. Rudd would not be amused if his scans made it to U-Tube.

Posted by: A Narchy, The Hills

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

That would be justice; scans of Rudd on youtube; this would prove that he wasn't only lacking in the credibility department.

Posted by: Seasoned Traveller, Planet Krypton

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

1) High level diplomats & foreign leaders should be made to go in it! 2) Can I wrap and hide a small weapon between my butt cheeks? 3) Cross dressers are going to be busted! 4) Can I hide a weapon on the soles of my feet? 5) I *still* don't see what is stopping me from packing a Jeep full of butane, smashing through the piss weak fence, racing under a fully fueled 747 or A380 stuck on the taxiway and detonating myself underneath it. I hate flying - bin Laden totally defeated the west.

Posted by: Ben GAnc, Canberra

 

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

This is in the name of "freedom". When our rights of freedom are limited, to keep our freedom, we dont have freedom at all. This " crap " about " Terror" has gone on long enough. Time to give us back the Freedom our SO CALLED democratic rights say we're meant to enjoy. We are living under laws swimilar to those the S.S. enjoyed with Hitler. Ben G. Is right. Hav e alook at the fences around the Airports. All we've done is Allow Bush to scare us and throw money to useless Security Services.

Posted by: Nick Again, Maryborough

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

The GM of the Office of Transport Security says "it’s not as invasive as some of the other equipment that we’ve got”.WOW-as someone who travels up to 4 times a week I have never encounted their "more invasive" equipment.They claim "the machine will be used as an alternative to a hand frisk with a hand wand" if you fail a normal metal detector test.I often fail the metal detector test and I have NEVER been hand frisked.I am not sure I want this for my teenage kids. I am not sure I want it for me.

Posted by: Jay Fx, Melbourne

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

The acceptance of these and more "so called" security measures may soon be reflected in traffic accident statistics around our country.

Posted by: Michael Clark, Brighton

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Last I heard, when you get an x ray, the operator stands behind a lead shield as x rays are after all radiation. The long term effects of frequent flyers, well lets say .... another stupid and unhealthy move from the powers that be. Hope their insurance is up to date. The long term effects coud be devestating.

Posted by: mat fav, Fairfield West NSW

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

This is a total outrage. Of course these images can be saved they will be needed in any following court action. I also believe Sky marshals are being withdrawn from service as they are considered not necessary going forward. Then WHY this total intrusion of privacy?

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Oh Paul, why so ANGRY????? Do you have something, or a lack of something you don't want people to see. Look at the X-RAY, do really think people will get off on that or use it for something on the net? If they did how would you or any of your friends know its you. What would you rather Paul, walking through a machine for 10sec or have a very large man search you (pat down). I'll take the X-Ray Machine anytime.

Posted by: POOR PAUL SO SAD, Sydney

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Hey fool if you think there is no chance that this information will not be misused in any way you must have a sub 10 I.Q. I'll take the pad down every day whilst I accidently look at your pathetic excuse for manhood on my laptop prior to boarding. God I must remember to change the filter on You Tube.

Posted by: Paul Trood, Southport

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

I would like to see if it's at all possible for this author to write a more biased article. I would say probably not. Besides, you're all missing the point. It worked in Total Recall, so it will work for us.

Posted by: Jason S, Tingalpa

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

We would never had this in Bob Hawkes day: (according to Bill Hayden anyway)

Posted by: Kermit Frog,

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

Well! It reveals the size of all concealed weapons.

Posted by: Rob Banks, Canberra

 

Thursday, 16 October 2008

God what a bunch of whingers you are! Is is about as sexually stimulating as an X-Ray - oh, oops it IS an X-Ray! It shows blurry grey on black, WHO CARES. If you don't like it, WALK. Or setup your own non-security airline and offer security-free discount travel. Then let the public decide! I wonder what the next "bulk-whinge" story will be ...

Posted by: Peter H, Sydney

Thursday, 16 October 2008

What I want to know is , how come we didnt get a male image as well as this female image. Ohhhh now I understand, from the male comments...its size that worries them.

Posted by: susan lawe, airport

 

Monday, 20 October 2008

If I ever am forced to go through the process of being scanned by this machine I am going to write "Screw You" on my chest with aluminum paste and try to give myself a huge erection before I go into the machine. LOL

Posted by: MyFirstName MyLastName, Streetsboro

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

We will not be flying anymore. Flying is now just a horrible invasion of privacy with geeky pervert police peeking at our privates. Its bad enough they want ot feel up our skirts but now they want to ogle my privates. They are just going to go away and wank themselves off. NO WAY. NEVER FLYING THANKS.

Posted by: Madison Kennedy, Sydney

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

I passed through one of these at amsterdam airport, they didn't even inform you of the nature of it!!! Grotesque invasion of privacy that helps no-one.

Posted by: Stu Anon, Edinburgh

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

I assume children will also be scanned. Are the scanners going to be scanned for pedophiles?

Posted by: Bob Smith, Philadelphia

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

This isn't a low-energy x-ray. It's at the opposite end of the spectrum, between the energy of radio and infrared. Low-energy x-rays are very much like high-energy UV light: they have trouble passing even through an inch of air, much less an article of clothing. This may sound like a nitpick, but it means that the EM waves in question are not able to break chemical bonds, and so the risk of cell damage is no greater than from a TV remote control.

Posted by: Joel Hollingsworth, oakland

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

Jay says: "I *still* don't see what is stopping me from packing a Jeep full of butane...and detonating myself" What is stopping you is basic chemistry, which I was surprised to learn some MDs remain unaware of. Detonation is a behavior limited to high explosives. Fuels sold for heating and vehicle use do not have any sort of oxidizer mixed in, and chemicals that might be used to add oxidizer in a practical way are dificult to obtain discreetly.

Posted by: Joel Hollingsworth, oakland

 

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

I used to be a homeless rodeo clown but now I am a world class magician !

Posted by: FP Magician, PieVille

 

Monday, 10 November 2008

I really don't see a huge problem. If you're hiding a gun in your ass you have more things to be worried about than someone seeing you naked. It doesn't say everyone will be required to do this, only those who can't pass the metal detector test. So unless you have a metal plate in your head or a gun in your ass you don't really have much of a problem. And if you do have a metal plate in your head, I'd assume you've already had to go through some shit trying to get through airport security anyway

Posted by: Lauren meh, Norman, OK

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field