Macquarie Network ::: 2GB | 2CH | LIVENEWS | STREET CORNER | RUGBYLEAGUELIVE | WHAT CAREER | AMAZING AUSTRALIANS :::
Friday, 09 January 2009

Murray-Darling in federal hands

4/12/2008 12:10:06 PM.  | 

It's official: the commonwealth has taken charge of Australia's largest river system as it battles a crippling drought.

The Senate passed laws on Thursday allowing a federal takeover of the Murray-Darling Basin.

It was the last hurdle in the historic takeover.

The basin states - Victoria, NSW, South Australia, and Queensland - have already passed laws handing over certain water powers to the commonwealth.

Since 1901 the states have been in charge of the basin, which is home to 61,000 farms and is the country's largest irrigated food bowl.

But a protracted drought, combined with the systematic over-allocation of water to irrigators, prompted federal politicians to instigate the takeover.

With the passage of the government's water laws, it's full speed ahead for the $13 billion rescue plan to preserve the basin's dwindling water resources.

A new authority will manage the basin and set caps on how much water can be taken out of its rivers.

The water laws do not prevent the construction of a controversial Victorian pipeline.

Federal Water Minister Penny Wong said the passage of the water laws was a significant step on the road to recovery for the parched basin.

"The approval of these reforms marks a critical change in how Australia's most important river system, the Murray-Darling Basin, is managed," Senator Wong said.

"We will work to meet the challenges faced by the basin, including over-allocation, drought and climate change."

She said the new regime would develop a basin plan, set caps on surface and groundwater extraction, set targets for water quality and salinity management and write rules about water trading.

The federal opposition voted for the water laws but criticised them for not going far enough.

"There are big improvements, big steps forward, (but) we wanted a truly national system," opposition water spokesman Greg Hunt said.

He called on the government to block Victoria's Sugarloaf pipeline, which will take up to 75 billion litres out of the basin each year.

The opposition had tried to amend the laws to block the pipeline, but backed down after the government rejected the amendment in the Senate.

Independent senator Nick Xenophon also took aim at the new system, saying the states still held too much power over the basin.

He called for a "full national takeover of the river system".

Senator Xenophon also slammed the Victorian pipeline and said the new system would take too long to enforce caps on water extraction.

Victoria does not have to enforce its cap until 2019.

COMMENTS

Thursday, 04 December 2008

Excellent Job Mr Rudd.Well done.This is well overdue and will benefit the Murray Darling System.Take a Bow! You deserve it,Along with Penny Wong and Peter Garret.

Posted by: Paul Keating, Dapto

 

Thursday, 04 December 2008

It would have happened sooner if the states hadn't voted not to for political reasons. Now there is no likelihood that the feds will properly manage it.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Thursday, 04 December 2008

Mr Rudd now has an extra 13 billion dollar pork barrel. Yay.

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball, Carramar/Sydney

 

Thursday, 04 December 2008

exactly fun ball,the asshole states used this as a political game,,they should be ashamed of the years they have wasted when it could have been done ealier

Posted by: D S, syd

 

Thursday, 04 December 2008

I thought the Fiberals were going to stop this? What happened? Oh no, they didn't Roll Back their policies, Again!

Posted by: Graeme Henderson, Darling Downs

 

Thursday, 04 December 2008

Anyone out there Know what the Constitution says about teh government taking water ownership from the States? Not sure but i thought it's againsst the Idea. If so, doesnt this all become out of order? the States then would be cullpable of what? diddling themselves?( hehe, i know, they're pollies, always diddling themselves) Anyway, just curious..me got a feeling its not meant to be done??

Posted by: Nick Again, maryborough

Thursday, 04 December 2008

Yep, the constitution gives certain powers to the commonwealth and the rest is up to the states. However at any time the States can hand back any of their power to the federal government. They can do it on a permenant basis, or on a temporary basis. Two recent examples 1) Victoria handed back its employment powers. 2) all States handed back their administrations powers re corporations. Water has been done the same way thats why the individual States HAD to agree, federal govt cannot force it.

Posted by: Concerned Liberal, Minto

 
 

YOUR SAY




 


 

500 characters maximum. 500 characters left.


 

* Required field

 
LiveNews now available on mobile devices

YOUR SAY

You can beat it Patrick, keep hoping & praying we all love you.... Judy Kennedy, Central Coast on 'I've been through hell': Patrick Swayze on acting with cancer

I would recomend that Israel finishes the job they've started once and for all. Do not finish untill all Hamas terorists are dead and then... Poison Pen, Sydney on Israel fires on targets in Lebanon

I feel this problem goes back to the Whitlam years when kids started getting money to stay at home and have kids, its easier than... Sue Quinn, Bargo on Rosemeadow families lash out at media after court

This has some great information about epilepsy and the myths surrounding it http://www.epilepsy.org.au/fact_sheets/About%20Epilepsy/SS_FactSheets_Exploding_myths_about_epilepsy.pdf. Please take the time to read this, it is important for... Jessica Rabbit, Sydney on Church of Scientology hits back at Jett Travolta drug claims

HI chris I would like to invite you to any family who own a bullmastiff or 2 and have young children For you to denegrade the... Nellie Abela, Bargo on Bullmastiffs must be banned